The Arabs felt betrayed when the British occupied Palestine after WWI because<u> they had been </u><u>promised independence.</u>
During WWI:
- The British and French encouraged Arabs to rebel against the Ottoman empire
- The British and French promised the Arabs independence in exchange for their support
When the war was over and the Arabs had fulfilled their side of the bargain, the British and French instead occupied Arab lands such as Palestine. This led to the Arabs being betrayed as they simply got new masters instead of independence.
In conclusion, the Arabs felt betrayed because the British had renegaded on a promise.
<em>Find out more on this betrayal at brainly.com/question/9229519. </em>
Answer:
The members of the executive branch are also the member of the parliament.
Explanation:
The members of the executive are also members of the parliament is the main reason why there is less conflict between the executive and the legislative. and they are required to get the political confidence first to execute laws. The relationship of confidence between the executive and the legislative is an important feature of the parliamentary governments and for that confidence, both should have a common policy program. Unlike the presidential system, there is no strict separation of the powers between the executive and the legislative bodies as the members of the legislature is also the member of the executive.
Answer:
(Approve officials named by the governor
(Work for the people of their districts
Hope this helps :)
Hello there!
The New Jersey Plan, by definition, was a group of proposals presented by William Patterson of New Jersey to the Constitutional Convention on June 15, 1787. The plan was created in response to the Virginia Plan, which called for two houses of Congress, both elected with apportionment according to population. The New Jersey Plan basically focused on ensuring that small states got an equal share of representation.
Hope I helped!
James Madison played a great role in establishment of the US as a republic. During the writing of the constitution, the founding fathers were adamant that they wanted democratic system of governance. However, they were torn between a direct democracy and a republican democracy. James Madison dismissed a direct democracy since the US is a large country and thus impossible to be governed through direct pure democracy. Instead, the father of the constitution argued for a scheme of representation in a republican setting. He especially lauded such a government since it even catered for the rights of the minority than in direct democracies.
