1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nataly862011 [7]
3 years ago
10

Mens rea is a Latin term that means guilty mind and refers to the concept of whether or not a person intended to commit

History
1 answer:
monitta3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Mens rea is considered a key component in many types of crimes for it is possible to be guilty of a crime because you knew it was immoral before you committed the act.

Explanation:

In all modern legal systems, there is a view that for the existence of criminal responsibility of a particular person, ie the possibility of punishing him, the unlawfulness of his behavior, ie wrongdoing, is not sufficient. In addition, there must be a certain psychological or mental element, the so-called mens rea, the culpability or mental element, which forms the guilt of such a person, that is the moral depravity or wrongful conduct of the same.

You might be interested in
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which legislation helped convince people to settle in the West in the late 1800s?
klemol [59]
I think homestead act
6 0
2 years ago
Do you think Roosevelt was a good wartime leader? Why or why not?
Morgarella [4.7K]
Yes, because he showed great leadership. He helped the US out during the Great Depression. He was confident, and turned out to be a great, powerful, and respected president.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For the first hundred years after the European rivals Japan experienced : select all that apply 1. Admiration from the Europeans
7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is

3. The influx of Christian missionaries

4. New technologies that included weapons

5. Cultural and religious exchanges between areas

Explanation:

As Japan interacted and experienced European culture for the first time, they were able to learn a lot from the new culture.

There was definitely an influx of missionaries from all over Europe who wanted to preach the Gospel and convert the local population.

Apart from this, the Japanese were able to learn about education and new technologies such as guns. The Japanese, before opening up believed they were very advanced, but after the Europeans, they understood their short-comings.

There were also plenty of cultural and religious exchanges taking place between them.

6 0
3 years ago
2 Points
WITCHER [35]
D is one way to tell a chemical change has occurred
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Choose the right word to complete the sentence.
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the best example of a topic sentence for an
    13·1 answer
  • Which item was a byproduct of the columbian exchange?
    6·2 answers
  • The early Paleozoic era was the time of the Cambrian explosion. What happened during the Cambrian explosion?
    11·1 answer
  • How does Chester A. Arthur's decisions influence us today?
    7·2 answers
  • How was the Atlantic seaboard divided?
    14·1 answer
  • Local governments do not have any responsibility to fix raods
    10·1 answer
  • What happened to Germany's economy after it was split into East and West Germany?
    14·2 answers
  • can you give me a 2 paragraph essay explaining Aztec priests and their role within the religion? The paragraphs should have at l
    5·1 answer
  • Based on what you have read, choose each response below that correctly describes what took place after the passage of the americ
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!