Answer:
Ronald Reagan's 1980 presidential campaign was a successful campaign for Reagan and his running mate George H. W. Bush's election and president and vice president of the United States. They defeated the incumbent Democratic President Jimmy Carter and Vice President Walter Mondale. Reagan, a Republican and former Governor of California announced his third presidential bid in a nationally televised speech from New York City. He campaigned extensively for the primaries after losing the Iowa caucus to Bush. In a republican debate in Nashua before the New Hampshire primary, when the moderator requested his microphone to be turned off, he furiously replied "I am paying for this microphone, Mr. Breen!". In the end, he won 44 states and 59.8% of the vote. He initially decided to nominate former President Gerald Ford as his running mate, but Ford wanted to be given such extended power as vice president (especially over the foreign policy) that their ticket would effectively amount to "co-presidency". As a result, negotiations to form a Reagan-Ford ticket ceased. Bush then selected former CIA director and George H. W. Bush as the vice presidential nominee.
Explanation:
Yes because national crises causes stress and people to sway their opinion.
Answer: C aka the 3rd one
Explanation:
Answer: Nationalism can lead to political conflict that if someone from a different country has pride in their country but someone doesn't like that country that the other person has, this can cause political conflict and wars.
Explanation: For example, in a historic time person A likes and has pride in country A. Person B disagrees and likes and has pride in country B. If person A and B doesn't agree with either country A or B, it can result in political conflict and cause war. Either person A wins or person B wins.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
There is no question here. It is just a statement.
However, doing some research we can say that the proper question for this statement is the following: <em>"Is Mark's service in a jury a responsibility or an obligation?"</em>
If that is the case, then the correct answer is "an obligation."
According to the laws of the state, an individual who is summoned by the state to be part of a jury has the obligation to attend. If he or she does not attend, he should be fined according to the law. If the individual cannot attend, it has to be for a very important situation that has to be explained. Otherwise, the state will consider his +/her negativity to attend as a contempt of court.
