Answer: Animal tricksters
Explanation: I hope this helps :)
Positive:
The years following the end of WW2 saw the United States consolidating as a superpower and the emergence of a global actor only equaled by the Soviet Union at the time. Efforts to prevent further conflicts in global scale resulted in the creation of the United Nations. The headquarters of many other multilateral organizations was lead by the US foreign policy that formerly didn't play such an active role
The "Marshal Plan" became a key for reconstruction of the European economies and it saw an emergence of financial institutions that fostered cooperation and development to many countries. This includes the World Bank, International Monetary Fund. This multilateral organisms were key to reconstruction of countries damaged by war.
Negative:
The policy of containment, and later the Cold war generated local conflicts, where famous cases like Vietnam generated a bad image to the World where Us should have not been involved
to prevent the spread of communism, saw the formation of the NATO, that nowadays is seen as an intromission from the US into European politics especially in the sphere of military and defense. Nato generates a huge military budget and relies on American troops when Europeans could be more involved in solving their particular issues and being more autonomous
Movement to merge immigrants into American society!
Answer:
The main job of a peasant was being a farmer. They often had side jobs of making silk, paper and pottery. Japanese peasants got paid in rice, and land. They paid taxes in rice and food every month, to the upper class and the lord, also, they paid taxes to the daimyo, samurai and the lord when he called.
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
Mrs. Gilbert E. Jones says in the document called: A Woman Assails Women’s Suffrage (of 1910), that she does agree that taxation without representation is tyranny. But this is not to be misunderstood, therefore the meaning behind the phrase, according to her, should be as clear as possible.
In Jones opinion, this phrase was used to talk about how some woman pay taxes yet are not represented.
In her own words <em>"If this is true without any qualification, it must be true not only of women, but of everybody"</em>.
