The answer is: The evidence is relevant but not sufficient.
The evidence is relevant enough to getting into an argument/ debate, and to question the claim, but it's not sufficient to win the claim. The claim is an statement in this case.
Answer:
the room for axing the airport in my life I will be there at the same time I don't have a car so I can see if you have any other ideas I will not have to be at the same time I don't have a car so I can get the same thing I don't like is my i the room for rent I can get the money from the bank and get a new
Explanation:
the room for axing the airport in my life I will be there at the same time I don't have a car so I can see if you have any other ideas I will not have to be at the same
the room for axing the airport in my life I will be there at the same time I don't have a car so I can see if you have any other ideas I will not have to be at the same time I don't have a car so I can get the same thing I don't like is my i the room for rent I can get the money from the bank and get a new I don't have a car so I can get the same thing I don't like is my i the room for rent I can get the money from the bank and get a new
the room for axing the airport in my life I will be there at the same time I don't have a car so I can see if you have any other ideas I will not have to be at the same time I don't have a car so I can get the same thing I don't like is my i the room for rent I can get the money from the bank and get a new
the room for axing the airport in my life I will be there at the same time I don't have a car so I can see if you have any other ideas I will not have to be at the same time I don't have a car so I can get the same thing I don't like is my i the room for rent I can get the money from the bank and get a new
the room for axing the airport in my life I will be there at the same time I don't have a car so I can see if you have any other ideas I will not have to be at the same time I don't have a car so I can get the same thing I don't like is my i the room for rent I can get the money from the bank and get a new
Hello. You did not quote the text to which this question refers, but I believe you are referring to James McPherson and the work he wrote called "What They Fought." However, you have not specified which part of the text the question refers to, which may leave the textual evidence inaccurate, but I hope I can help you.
In writing "What They Fought" James McPherson aimed to show the reasons that led southern and northern soldiers to maintain the American civil war, especially southern soldiers while they saw the impending defeat. He did this by analyzing letters and diaries of these soldiers who showed their thoughts without any kind of censorship or control. This objective is shown in a very clear and attractive way to the public, primarily because McPerson presents an accessible, easy and direct language text, which allows the reader to quench curiosity about the soldiers' thoughts in the face of such a great conflict.
Answer:
You didn't list the following but the definition of a rhetoric is the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, especially the use of figures of speech and other com positional techniques.
