It was Socrates who satirized the sophists for making the
weaker argument stronger and called it a “really good bullsh*t.” Sophist also
known to developed a reputation of immorality because of it and charged with
fees. The Sophistic teachings are now
useful in democratic Athens.
A stronger colonial stance aganist New France more self- goverment in the colonial fimer control over an increasingly independent New England the restablishment of royal control over New York and New Jersey.
The Romans and Greeks err studied
You might want to take a better picture. ^-^
I didn't read it, but with common logic, won't a railroad be a lot faster in transporting people/cargo around instead of making them walk or sit in long, bumpy carriage rides?
There you go. :)
Hope this helps,
-Tiara
Answer:1) Under the Articles there was only a unicameral legislature so that there was no separation of powers.
2) The central government under the Articles was too weak since the majority of the power rested with the states.
3) Congress, under the Articles, did not have the power to tax which meant that they could never put their finances in order.
4) In order to change or amend the Articles, unanimous approval of the states was required which essentially meant that changes to the Articles were impossible.
5) For any major laws to pass they had to be approved by 9 or the 13 states which proved difficult to do so that even the normal business of running a government was difficult.
Explanation:
easy
