Answer:
no i don't think so because young kids might accidentally hurt themselves with it
Explanation:
Answer: It is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork.
Explanation:
Parvati's argument in favor of using cell phones in class is valid and sufficient. The evidence she presents is strong - she claims that cell phones are useful research tools that enable us to find the right piece of information. She also provides specific examples and even explains a situation in her class where cell phones were used. This makes her argument convincing, because she supports her claim with solid evidence.
the answer should be D. Because the above answers give us statements outlining their point of the essay, such as "Celebrities don't set good examples for children."
This pattern for an argumentative essay is more advanced than the previous three, and allows for a more complete development of your argument.
The pattern contains an introduction, a conclusion, and two main parts. In the three paragraphs of the first body part, you refute or rebut three points of the counterclaim. In three paragraphs of the second body part, you make three points in support of your main idea, and provide support for your claims.
