The clause that completes the sentence by creating parallelism is exercise regularly. Thus, the correct option is B.
<h3>What is Clause?</h3>
A clause may be defined as a cluster of words with a subject and a verb that are typically utilized to add more attributes to the noun in a sentence.
In the given sentence, a list of measures are mentioned that are actively creating parallelism. The grammatical components that are utilized to characterize measures and efforts in English are verbs.
The complete question is as follows:
Read the sentence.
For optimal health, eat plenty of fresh fruits and vegetables, and sleep at least seven hours a night.
Which clause completes the sentence by creating parallelism?
- regular exercise
- exercise regularly
- exercising regularly
- you get regular exercise
Therefore, the correct option for this question is B, i.e. exercise regularly.
To learn more about Clause, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/766213
#SPJ1
Answer:
Killing should never really be considered to be justified whether in a work of fiction or not; however, Rainsford was in a position of kill or be killed. The whole thing is a case of kill or be killed, essentially self defense. I guess it depends on how you view that type of thing, but in my opinion, if Rainsford had not killed Zaroff, then he would have undoubtedly died. Therefore, yes I believe he was justified in his decision.
As with all interpretive questions, your answer is based upon your own reading of the story and how you analyze the plot and characters. Rainsford had escaped Zaroff, and won the game. There was no reason to return to the masion and kill Zaroff except to exact revenge. Consider that Rainsford himself is a hunter, used to being in power. Although he had never considered doing something as inhumane as Zaroff in hunting humans, his choice to kill Zaroff reveals his need to be in control. In this case, his killing of Zaroff isn't about justice, but about revenge.
On the other hand, there is nothing to suggest Zaroff would have quit hunting humans. He was a static character, who didn't change even when he "lost" the hunt of Rainsford. In this reading, the audience can interpret that Rainsford is doing his part for mankind by eliminating the threat of the murderer Zaroff. After all, on this island, there is no justice system by which to prosecute him.
You will need to choose the answer that best supports your understanding of the characters.
Answer: A magnificent and great inspiration came after he returned his "straitened means" to his pocket. An inspiration to get others to do the work for him while paying Tom for the pleasure of painting the fence.
Explanation:
As Tom was looking at his belongings and put them away he had an inspiration to get the work done but not by himself. He went to whitewash the fence for his aunt and did this as though he was painting a masterpiece as an famous artist would paint.
When the boys started coming up to Tom to make fun of him and tease him for working, Tom explained it wasn't work and he was enjoying whitewashing the fence and acted like he didn't need help. The other boys all ended up whitewashing the fence and paying Tom for the pleasure of doing it.
Tom ended up with a whole apple, a dead rat, a kite, and other things that only boys would love.
A. Ida frequently encourages the narrator of the story.
My reasoning for believing this is because in the sentence given, Ida is there, by the narrator's side the whole time being kind and trying to keep the narrator brave and strong.
Hope this helped! -Austin
