Answer:
If you write an essay about your favourite television show, you probably want to <em>inform</em> your audience what you consider is so good about it and <em>why you think it is important for others to watch it.</em>
Explanation:
If you think the best format to express why you think that show is the best show on tv, you probably think that you need to give precise information and data in order to be clear for your audience, otherwise, you would just write a short article or you would tweet about it. But, you think the essay is the best way because you think of it as a deep subject, you have reasons, you have information and you want everyone to know how this show is so great and why they should watch it too.
You would C., begin the research process a second time, because DEFINITELY in a research paper/topic you need the MOST information, facts, and details about your topic to really inform as much as possible to your readers about your topic! If it's a lil relevant and too general to give specific support, that shows you need to rewrite your paper, as you may get scored poorly as it does not sufficiently answer the prompt.
I hope I helped! ;-;
Seems like fun.
I can help a little but not all the way, sorry.
I forgot how to label "no way" since it's been five years I last learned this stuff.
Anyways, "ask" is a verb. "Gerald" is a proper noun. The word "to" is a preposition and begins a propositional phase.
Everytime a preposition is used, it has to end with an object of the preposition. In laymen terms, everytime a preposition is used, it will always modify something in the sentence.
The word "to" modifies "go". What does Gerald want to accomplish? He want TO do something. What does he want to do? He wants to go somewhere.
So, "to" is the object of the preposition or what the preposition is modifying. Hopefully, that helps. Good luck!
Hmm, a strong argument typically includes a statement of one's own opinion, then your opponent's counterclaim, and reasons why the counterclaim is inaccurate or invalid. For instance, Tammy could have started off with a statement about how animal safety benefits the animals, and then address the counterclaim about it being expensive by stating it doesn't just help the animals, but the people as well. I think the answer here is false because Tammy's speech didn't include an argument about how expensive animal safety is. So false. I hope this helps, sorry it's so long.
