Bruno's father really knows when to argue and when to be silent, the problem is that he only does this for his own benefit and regardless of how his argument or silence can harm, hurt and even confuse other people. It was arguing that Bruno's father was able to establish his authority over those he recognizes as weaker and it was his ability to remain silent that allowed Bruno's father to achieve increasingly successful positions in his profession.
However, these capabilities contributed to Bruno's confusion and curiosity about the prisoners. It was exactly this curiosity and confusion that made Bruno come to a terrible end.
For this reason, we could advise Bruno's father not to remain silent in the face of injustices against the most disadvantaged people. Furthermore, he should use his ability to argue against injustices and explain to his family the wrong and awful things that are happening.
Answer:they are different
Explanation: because william is talking about how he ate the plum and didnt mean to eat it and soto was talking about how the pie is so good and tasty so both of them are same and different because they both talk about how they ate the food that was delicious
Explanation:
(a) fast foods/their/making/children/are/staple diet
children are making fast foods their staple diet
.
(b) causing/is/among/a great alarm/health experts/it
It is causing a great alarm among health experts
.
(c) need/that/get/healthy food/welto ensure/our children
We need to ensure that our children get healthy food.
The words from the question are jumbled and with their proper connection, they will create meaningful sentences.
With this rearranged sentences we are having issues about the problem with children and fast food that they are eating.
Uhm for people to help you may wanna add a picture so they know what the passage is about
