1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Iteru [2.4K]
3 years ago
14

A centralização política nas mãos do Monarca (Rei), donde ele, como o poder soberano, decretava as leis, arrecadava impostos bem

como organizava os exércitos nacionais. Todas essas características mediante o poder centrado numa única figura soberana, o Rei, ficou conhecida como
History
1 answer:
Allisa [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Absolutismo.

Explanation:

Absolutismo denota una forma de gobierno tradicionalmente caracterizada por la posición central del monarca, el centralismo económico y político, la importancia del ejército y el aparato administrativo, la existencia de la corte y la iglesia estatal. Con el tiempo, el término absolutismo se utiliza para el período comprendido entre mediados del siglo XVII (a veces finales del siglo XVI) hasta la Revolución Francesa.

You might be interested in
1. Describe what bias means, along with three guidelines you can follow to help you decide whether a source is overly biased. (4
Inessa [10]

We can say that a person is biased when their opinion or recollection of something favors one <u>person, idea, or group</u> more so than the other. It is the inability to remain impartial.

Though it cannot be denied that the statement that was given by Lum May as to the events of November 3rd, 1885 may be biased, I do not believe his account of the occurrence is overly biased. He describes the violent nature of the altercation, the burning down of Chinese homes, and the trauma that overtook the sanity of his wife.

All of these statements made by Lum May are backed by evidence such as:

  • The piles of ashes where Chinese homes once stood
  • A similar recollection of the events from hundreds of Chinese citizens who were present
  • The unstable nature of his wife's mental health.

All of this leads us to believe that Lum May is a credible source for the events of <em>November 3rd, 1885 </em>in Tacoma.

Unlike the credible testimony of Lum May, we can infer that the letter from James Wickersham is not only extremely biased in nature, but also an overwhelmingly unreliable source of information. Many of the participants of that day were indicted for their actions, giving Mr. Wickersham much to lose were he to provide accurate information.

The evidence supporting the statements of Lum May allows us to infer that her recollection of the events is credible and not overly swayed by bias. However, the contradictory statements declared by James Wickersham and the repercussions he may face should he tell the truth, point towards his letter being an unreliable and overly biased source.

To learn more visit:

brainly.com/question/25061293?referrer=searchResults

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Except for thd battle of Glorieta Pass, the confederates won the encounters in New Mexico. What factors may have contributed to
Helga [31]
Clearly not their target market. If more myself though I’m not really sure what I’m using it for, I keep in mind thepeople wanted <span>[email protected] PHP htheir own TOS. Since nearly every Host provides some sort of site builderost information Linux. Originally Posted by IH-Jake Yes, they do need hosting for database,ed amounts, then it</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls answer correctly
Kamila [148]

Answer:

B AND C

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How did the Tennessee Valley Authority help to bring America out of the Great Depression?
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

it helped bring america out of the depression because it showed farming skills.

Explanation:

it taught americans better farming methods, replanting trees, and building dams. This was also important because it created jobs, surplus electricity, and saved water power.

8 0
3 years ago
List three details of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Then give two reasons some U.S. senators opposed this treaty.
iris [78.8K]

Answer:

1) Mexico agreed to give up Texas and a vast region (Mexican Cession: CA, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico)

2) Mexico gave up half of all its territory  

3) US payed $15 million  

Senators:

-thought the US had no right to take Mexican territory other than Texas  

-Others wanted even more land

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the U.S. finally able to gain the upper hand on Japan as losses mounted up?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these NOT pictured in Source 2 addresses a common imperial technique implemented by the Chinese comparable to the techn
    9·2 answers
  • What divided the New England Mid Atlantic in southern colonies into three <br> separate regions
    14·1 answer
  • Prior to World War II, Japan, led by the military leadership of General Hideki Tojo, had focused its imperialist desires on whic
    11·2 answers
  • How did the British army cross swamps
    8·1 answer
  • What culture was the birthplace of democracy<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • Write a one- to two-paragraph essay that answers the following question:
    10·1 answer
  • Freeee just follow :D​
    9·2 answers
  • Why don’t we have White History month?
    9·1 answer
  • Difference between Phanerozoic eon and Proterozoic eon
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!