The answer was D. "a" was jesus da son. "b" was alexander da grrrrreat. "c" was sargon da ancient dude dat was in messy pat tame ea.
The answer is Expanded trade increased contact and influence among Mediterranean cultures.
<span>The Minoan culture was developed on the Island of Crete in the Insular region of Greece, which gave it a large maritime coastline that offered advantages for navigation. This privileged situation led him to serve as a link between the eastern region and the western region; which had a special connotation in relation to commercial activities.
The Minoans were great navigators; very important aspect because it helped to bring the influence of this Culture to the rest of the Aegean countries and develop trade to the point of controlling the sea routes of the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Its commercial contact points also included Egypt, Cyprus, Syria, Asia Minor, Sicily and the rest of Greece.</span>
Answer:
Social Darwinism describes the various theories that emerged in Western Europe and North America in the 1870s which applied biological concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest to sociology, economics, and politics.
Explanation:
hope this helps!
Answer: The freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Explanation: New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of American public officials to sue for defamation. The Supreme court specifically held that if a plaintiff in a defamation lawsuit is a public official or person running for public office, not only must they prove the normal elements of defamation, they must also prove that the statement was made with "actual malice", meaning that the defendant either knew the statement was false or recklessly disregarded whether or not it was true.
The Court said it was necessary to protect the erroneous statements about public officials that would come up in free debate, otherwise critics of public officials will censor their speech for fear of potentially unlimited liability which could severely limit the information that could be given or published about the character of such officials.