1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zimovet [89]
3 years ago
15

Did Japan achieve its desired goal in the attack on Pearl Harbor? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
iVinArrow [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes mostly, the goal waas to destroy the American fleet and crush the spirits of Americans. They only succeeded in this partly. The attack DID weaken the fleet of the American's but it also gave them the resolve to enter the war.

You might be interested in
How a person's cultural bias can impact Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander
Nataly_w [17]

A person's cultural bias can impact Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander through discrimination and racism.

<h3>What is Bias?</h3>

This involves the process in which a a particular person is supported or opposed in an unfair manner based on criteria such as gender, ethnicity etc.

The cultural bias can impact Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander thereby resulting in racism and discrimination which isn't ideal and should be avoided at all costs.

Read more about Cultural bias here brainly.com/question/2500538

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
According to John Green, why did the
Sever21 [200]

Answer: Ineffective Generaling

Explanation:

According to John Green in the series, <em>Crash Course US History,</em> the North lost several battles during the beginning years of the Civil war due to ineffective leadership from the Union Generals. A term he called <em>Ineffective Generaling</em>.

This was in reference to the ineffectiveness of leaders such as Maj. Generals  Benjamin Butler, John Pope, Ambrose Burnside and even the overly indecisive and cautious George McClellan all of whom allowed the Confederacy to gain an advantage in battles against the Union which was larger and better equipped.

3 0
3 years ago
Did the Renaissance improve the lives of women or did it entrench women further into
natka813 [3]

Answer:

The question of “did women have a renaissance” is not something that has not been asked before. In 1977 Joan Kelly wrote an essay addressing this question specifically. In the Renaissance, when the political systems changed from the Medieval feudal systems, women of every social class saw a change in their social and political options that men did not. Celibacy became the female norm and "the relations of the sexes were restructured to one of female dependency and male domination" (Kelly 20). Women lived the life of the underlying sex. Men ruled over everything, even through half a century of Queens.

“When England was ruled for half a century by Queens but women had almost no legal power; When marriage, a women’s main vocation, cost them their personal property rights; when the ideal women was rarely seen and never heard in public; when the clothes a women wore were legally dictated by her social class; when almost all school teachers were men; when medicine was prepared and purified at home; when corsets were

constructed of wood and cosmetics made of bacon and eggs; when only half of all babies survived to adulthood?" (Hull 15).

The above passage says a lot about women in the Renaissance. The role of women was a very scarce role. Women were supposed to be seen and not heard. Rarely seen at that. Women were to be prim and proper, the ideal women. Females were able to speak their minds but their thoughts and ideas were shaped by men. Mostly everything women did had input given by men. Women were controlled by her parents from the day she is born until the day she is married, then she would be handed directly to her husband so he could take over that role. In the time of the renaissance women were considered to legally belong to their husbands. Women were supposed to be typical ‘housewives.'

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Convert the fraction 234/14 into decimal
Olin [163]

Answer:

16.714

Explanation:

\frac{234}{14}  \frac{ \times 7.14285714}{ \times 7.14285714}  \\  =  \frac{1671.42857}{100}  \\  = 16.714

5 0
3 years ago
PLease help me!!!
Harlamova29_29 [7]
I am sure it is control the money supply and manage economic growth
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Henry Ford affect American industry?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the Hindu belief in reincarnation contribute to people's acceptance of the jati system?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these was a target of Progressive reformers?
    14·2 answers
  • In the area of immigration, there are two factors that contribute to people leaving their countries for other ones. Which factor
    9·2 answers
  • What item do we use everyday made by the han chinese?
    13·1 answer
  • How do u make your d big?
    10·1 answer
  • What parts of American society is Hughes critical of?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did people in the 1830s suppler the Indian removal act
    7·1 answer
  • How did the term negro came about?
    12·1 answer
  • What advantages would the possession of the Philippines give to the U.S.?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!