Answer:
Negative punishment.
Explanation:
Punishment refers to any change that takes place in the aspects that surround a human or an animal. This change occurs after a given response, as well as it decreases the possibility that this behavior will happen in the future.
Thus, it is the behavior that is punished, not the human or animal. In experiments made with laboratory animals, as well as some studies with some children, punishment usually decreases the possibility of a previously reinforced response in a temporary way.
Answer: Main message or source
Explanation: According to the situation that is described in the question ,Chipolte is acting as the main source or message for Terri as she was aiming to get the Mexican grill from there. Reaching Chipolte was missed by her due to the small child on the street.
The small child was acting as the noise source which distracted her from reaching Chipolte. She tried to protect the child while driving and because of that her destination (Chipolte) was missed.
Answer:
The Safety Committee is an example of a <u><em>horizontal design</em></u> within an organization.
Explanation:
In a horizontal design, members or workers perform certain tasks in which they are not given orders by the manager. They perform the tasks on their own and might inform the actions to the manager. The same design was being used by the Safety Committee in which the members met twice a month as a committee.
On the other hand, a vertical design is a business design in which the manager simply orders the workers to perform tasks ans all the tasks are performed accordingly to the manager.
I am really not sure what could be the answer, but the crusades were mainly because the emperor wanted to regain lost territory, Pope wanted to strength his power, to defend Christianity and as well, to monopolize important trading centers. Which I think it is..
C)Europeans merchants wanted spices and silks from the east.
Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
