Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

8

Ralph and simone do business as tech troubleshooters, a partnership. in most states, for the purposes of collecting judgments an

d having accounting performed, tech troubleshooters would be treated as?

1 answer:

aivan3 [116]3 years ago

3 0

<span>The tech troubleshooters would be treated as "</span>Entity"

You might be interested in

The Japanese method of organizing for product design features: a. teams. b. product managers (champions). c. distinct department

Dvinal [7]

Answer:

The correct option is D, a single organization without subdivisions or individual teams.

Explanation:

Typically organizations are divided along functions and divisions.

A functional structure consists of different departments such as production,marketing ,finance.supply chain,maintenance, human resources and so on,with each function saddled with distinct responsibilities and having its own performance metrics.

Under a divisional structure, the firm is divided into division based on location or products with each division having different functions under it.

However, the Japanese method does not support divisionalization or departmentalization, instead advocated for an organization where everyone irrespective of specialty is seen as a member of a single team

8 0

3 years ago

Based on the industry-low, industry-average, and industry-high values for the benchmarked data on p. 7 of the FIR, which one of

BARSIC [14]

Answer:

The Correct answer is "The Company’s cost of branded pair sold in the Asia-Pacific region was barely below the industry average".

Explanation:

At the point when the working benefits of the Company's Cost of branded pair sold in the Asia-Pacific district is below the normal of industry-high qualities, the organization's expense of branded pair sold in that area turns out to be subsequently a legitimate sign that there is positively Company's too high relative expense in atleast one components that it enjoys.

3 0

3 years ago

Give some examples of each of the three ""occasions for decision"" cited by Chester Barnard. Explain in your own words why Barna

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer: The three "occasions for decision" are:

1. From authoritative communications from superiors

2. From cases referred for decision by subordinates

3. From cases originating in the initiative of the executive command

Explanation: Examples of the three "occasions for decision" are:

1. From authoritative communications from superiors: an increase in the annual target of a sales force, passed on from the director to the sales manager.

This type of decision making is usually about the application of an instruction.

2. From cases referred for decision by subordinates: decision to employ branch level staff, whose engagement is within the right of the branch manager

This occasion for decision shows a lack of authority in subordinates or an inability to be decisive in the subordinate.

3. From cases originating in the initiative of the executive command: the CEO deciding to take his brick and mortar business completely online.

This is a decision that that is totally the product of the executive head's thoughts, it is usually a strategic level decision and opens his authority to criticism.

Chester Barnard believed that this is the most important occasion for decision because the executive head is best placed to make these decisions in the organization. He has the authority as well as resources to ensure that the decision is followed through.

I also agree that this is the most important occasion for decision. While they are difficult decisions, they can determine the direction of an organization. There is no one better qualified than the executive command to make or initiate these decisions. Also, it is part of their responsibility to make these decisions.

6 0

3 years ago

In order for mutually beneficial trade to occur between two otherwise isolated nations, Multiple Choice each nation must face co

serg [7]

In order for mutually beneficial trade to occur between two otherwise isolated nations, each nation must be able to produce at least one good relatively cheaper than the other.

<h3>What does comparative advantage mean?</h3>

A country has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared to other countries. A country should specialise in the production of goods for which it has a comparative advantage. This is when trade can be mutually beneficial .

To learn more about comparative advantage, please check: brainly.com/question/25812820

6 0

2 years ago

Why it is important to consider all aspects of a job before accepting the position? provide at least two reasons?

Lemur [1.5K]

Because how do you know whether or not to accept the position. How do you know if it’s the right job for you? Or, what if you have to choose between two appealing offers? Will you feel comfortable with the people you work with?

3 0

3 years ago