Answer:
Tough question to answer.
Explanation:
This is a tough question to answer. Although it is in the Senate's constitutional right to conduct an impeachment trial, the Constitution states an an impeachment is only for a sitting US president and does not have much guidance for a non-sitting US president. As of now, Donald Trump is a private citizen and therefore the impeachment may not directly effect him in the same way as a sitting US president. However, an impeachment where he is found guilty will disallow him from running for office again in the future.
Although there are many arguments and opinions to this particular subject, the current impeachment seems to be more politically motivated than actually needed.
Answer:
The Crisis of the Third Century, also known as Military Anarchy or the Imperial Crisis (235–284 AD), was a period in which the Roman Empire nearly collapsed under the combined pressures of barbarian invasions and migrations into the Roman territory, civil wars, peasant rebellions, political instability (with multiple usurpers competing for power), Roman reliance on (and growing influence of) barbarian mercenaries known as foederati and commanders nominally working for Rome (but increasingly independent), plague, debasement of currency, and economic depression.
The Crisis of the Third Century, also known as Military Anarchy or the Imperial Crisis (235–284 AD), was a period in which the Roman Empire nearly collapsed under the combined pressures of barbarian invasions and migrations into the Roman territory, civil wars, peasant rebellions, political instability (with multiple usurpers competing for power), Roman reliance on (and growing influence of) barbarian mercenaries known as foederati and commanders nominally working for Rome (but increasingly independent), plague, debasement of currency, and economic depression.
Answer:
trade
Explanation:
they traded to expand the empire
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the argument having to do with the fact that capitalism is the driving force of wealth--since without these leaders capitalism would cease to thrive. </span></span>
2.What economic and social factors in the United States led to differing ideas about slavery in the North and the South? Explain and support your answer with details.
Northern States,dependent on merchants and trading posts, had no need for slaves, seeing that they were well equipped with machinery and factory job, and needed skilled, trained labor.. Money making was easier, and they had the idea that they could bring these jobs to the South.But the South, which relied heavily on agriculture, and needed a lot of manpower to keep it running. But, unlike the more Puritan North, they decided to rely on slaves, refusing to pay them.So when the North became aware of this, it created upset, and unrest.
