1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BlackZzzverrR [31]
3 years ago
15

The Court has established a three-part test to define obscenity, including applying “local community standards” in determining w

hether materials are offensive. How might the “local community” element of the test be affected when considering materials sent over the Internet?
Law
1 answer:
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Miller Test is the primary legal test for determining whether expression constitutes obscenity. It is named after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. California (1973). The Miller test faced its greatest challenge with online obscenity cases. In Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002), a case challenging the constitutionality of the Child Online Protection Act, several justices questioned the constitutionality of applying the local community standards of Miller to speech on the Internet. In this photo, Associate Legal Director of the ACLU Ann Beeson gestures during a news conference outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 2, 2004 in Washington. The ACLU claimed COPA violated the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. They challenged the law on behalf of online bookstores, artists and others, including operators of Web sites that offer explicit how-to sex advice or health information. The Supreme Court agreed with the lower court’s ruling that COPA did not pass the strict scrutiny test used to judge obscenity cases. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, used with permission from the Associated Press)

Explanation:

d

You might be interested in
True or false? The Felony Murder rules states if you kill someone, even without intent, while in the commission of a felony, you
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

i'm pretty sure it's true because they consider it murder anyways.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
.
Veseljchak [2.6K]

Answer:

Neither man wanted to press charges.

Explanation:

I'll just say why the other answers are wrong

B. There are witnesses, it says that several people were loitering around the club

C. There does not need to be camera footage of the fight to arrest one or both of the men and charge them with assault, battery, etc.

D. The officers arrived after the fight had ended and they had been injured, also officers do not personally have to witness a crime to charge an individual with one.

5 0
2 years ago
The dying cancer patient problem 9.1
oksian1 [2.3K]
What is the problem..?
5 0
2 years ago
A homeowner sued a contractor in federal court for damages resulting from an unsuccessful roof repair. However, the homeowner fa
denis23 [38]

Answer: No, because a dismissal based on lack of personal jurisdiction is not on the merits.

Explanation:

Following the information given in the question, it should be noted that the case should not be dismissed by the court due to the fact that the dismissal is based on the lack of personal jurisdiction.

It should be noted that the claim preclusion should be added to the answer of the defendant as it's an affirmative defense and it requires more than the claimant bringing a case against the same defendant.

5 0
3 years ago
The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless when in cases of rebellion. True or False
nydimaria [60]

The given statement “It is well understood and specified that the privileges prolonged under the Habeas corpus writ is not suspended until unless there is a case of rebel” is true.

Answer: Option 1

<u>Explanation: </u>

The case where there is rebel or in case of invasion, the suspension is achieved for the Habeas corpus writ. This is in accordance to the suspension clause of the constitution with the section of 9 in clause second under the Article 1.

The rebel or invasion is for the requirement of public safety as in regard.  If in the case raised, then the President,  only one who had the power to suspend it as per the constitution.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What might cutting taxes increase economic output and total employment
    11·1 answer
  • 24.3. State legislatures are organized like
    13·2 answers
  • As you enter the expressway from the ______ lane, adjust your speed to the flow of traffic. Select a gap, signal, and check mirr
    14·1 answer
  • Howell made long-distance telephone calls through the telephone company’s computer- controlled switching system to solicit fundi
    13·1 answer
  • And answer
    9·1 answer
  • The number of Electoral Votes each
    12·1 answer
  • If some girl were to kill herself unless she had a friend would you be her friend?
    5·1 answer
  • Mrs. Slow was driving her small compact car down Main Street when she was rear-ended by Mr. Fast driving a large truck. Mrs. Slo
    10·2 answers
  • Status offenses are violations of the law:
    11·1 answer
  • Were the causes of the War of 1812 more political or economic? Do you think there was just cause for the US to declare war on Gr
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!