Answer: In 1842, Harriet made her escape to freedom. She sailed to Philadelphia, and after a short stay, travelled to New York City by train. There she was reunited with her daughter, who had in the meantime been sent by her father. I personally am glade she escaped.
Explanation:
Amendment 6 guarantees a speedy trial which is public and assessed by a jury that is chosen as easily as it can be accomplished to be impartial. It also makes a requirement that the defendant must understand the charge. And he has the right to question his accusers and present witnesses who will speak on his behalf.
D really doesn't matter. Americans are governed by their own constitution, not the constitution and laws of other nations.
Not A: Though 12 is not a magic number (6 jurors could be chosen and that number will be enough), the supreme court has ruled that the number of jurors cannot go below 6. I don't think there is an upper limit, but common practice is 12 and almost any crime can be tried by a jury if the amount involved is over 20 dollars. (That's amendment 7). I don't think A is what you want.
The other 2 are covered by D. I honestly don't think there is a good answer to this question. Sometimes you get questions like this. I suppose that since you cannot pick anything else, pick D, but a warning. It could be A or B. The right to a speed open trial where the charge is understood, is what the constitution guarantees.
Answer:
B. The place where ice dwarfs originated.
Explanation:
In the passage, astronomers conducted extensive research and investigated. During the investigation, the original of ice dwarfs was discovered. It was stated that they originated in the section known as the Kuiper Belt. This section provides the relevant conditions needed by the ice dwarfs to survive. Therefore, the right answer is option B.
The author of Source 3 counters the argument regarding giant pandas by stating that they're beneficial to the ecosystem.
<h3>What is an argument?</h3>
It should be noted that an argument simply means the stance of an individual regarding an issue.
In this case, the author of Source 3 most clearly counter the argument in Source 1 that protecting giant pandas isn't appropriate by stating that they play an important role in the ecosystem.
Learn more about arguments on:
brainly.com/question/3775579
