One of the many points of contention between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the Constitution’s lack of a bill of rights that would place specific limits on government power. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
Answer:which statement there is none
Explanation:
The statement that explains why Britain became a part of the Roman Empire much later than nearby Gaul is that t<span>he channel of water between Britain and Gaul was an obstacle.
The Romans didn't find it easy to cross these huge amounts of water, which is why their conquering of Britain came later than nearby Gaul.
</span>
