1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uranmaximum [27]
2 years ago
14

In 1946 Stalin placed tight restrictions on countries in the?

History
1 answer:
Monica [59]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Eastern bloc

Explanation:

In 1946 Stalin placed tight restrictions on countries in the "EASTERN BLOC"

The purpose of placing tight restrictions is to control the area following the aftermath of world war II. He was able to do this by using the Soviet Union red army to control the activities of the countries in Eastern Bloc such as Poland, East Germany, Albania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Romania, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary.

You might be interested in
Hi I have a in-class debate, and I need the key points for the colonists reasons for battle of Lexington and Concord, why did th
harina [27]
I don’t know hmmm......,,,,
7 0
3 years ago
A series of legislative acts passed under the Grant administration in 1870 and 1871 authorized federal
lawyer [7]
The D. Force acts a series of <span>legeslative</span> acts that <span>passedunder</span> the Grant administration in 1870 and 1871 authorized federal protection for black suffrage through the use of the Army against the Ku Klux Klan.
8 0
3 years ago
Why was slavery a contradictory issue<br> in Jeffersons life
artcher [175]

Answer:

Because Jefferson was actually against slavery. Even while he owned slaves, it sickened him. however Jefferson as in some of his writings, feared that unless given a direction Slaves would not be productive members of society as they would not, and that due to their lack of education would rebel against their previous owners even thouh they became free.

Jefrerson battles with the idea of freeing slaves and the idea of the consequences of freeing the slaves giving them nothing and having come from nothing. to him it would have been just as bad to free them with nothing to stand on as opposed to keeping them in their current state until something better could be arranged for them.

8 0
3 years ago
Tyranny of individual states over the central government: What if states had the power to ignore a federal tax law they did not
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

What would happen if the states had the power to ignore Federal tax law they did not like? If they ignore it it could temper with the economy if they choose to except the tax it could be income for those same people. ... Road island would barely have a say in any laws that were being made.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Describe how the Catholic church officials were breaking their vows​
Brums [2.3K]
Touching underage boys, when that obviously goes against the bible
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The significance of the American Revolution derives from all of the following
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the south claim that the federal government had its contrast with the states
    11·1 answer
  • The civil rights act of 1968 meant ________. select all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast the lives of patricians and plebeians in the Roman republic
    8·2 answers
  • How has the population in Ghana changed from how it was thousands of years ago?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did people disagree with alexander hamilton’s plan for a national bank
    15·2 answers
  • (07.02 MC)Which of these are Chinese inventions that were important for bookmaking? paper and movable type paint and calfskin pa
    14·1 answer
  • Was tenant farming and sharecropping a necessary step towards economic recovery in the South and Texas? Why or why not? Explain
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the Confederacy have a difficult time stopping Sherman?
    14·1 answer
  • HELP PLZ WILL GIVE BRAINIEST
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!