1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VikaD [51]
3 years ago
7

"The Stench of hold.. was so intolerably loathsome, that it was dangerous

History
2 answers:
Crazy boy [7]3 years ago
5 0
I think the answer should be A
daser333 [38]3 years ago
4 0
I think the answer should be A
You might be interested in
1. Compare and contrast transcription and translation. Be sure to include how they are the same and how they are different.
jolli1 [7]

Transcription is the process of written down information that may come from a speech or sing language, a video or some audio form of lecture, it is related mostly to the process of turning an oral content into a written content, but you can also do the transcription of a manuscript.

While translation is getting the information that is being communicated from one language to another, translation always involve two languages or more. Translation can be done from oral form to oral, or from oral form to written form, but in both cases the language is changed.

Transcription and translation are the same as they covert information.

  *Transcription will convert the form, for example from oral to written.

   *Translation will convert from one language to another language, for example from english-spanish.

Transcription and translation are different regarding number of languages involved in the process.

  *Transcription normally involves one language.

  *Translation involves at least two languages.

Transcription and Translation are different regarding the skills required.

  *Transcription will require good knowledge in the language you are transcribing the information, good listening and typing skills.

  * Translation will require fluency in the languages you are working it and also that understand as a native how some colloquial expression work, also good grammar knowledge of both languages.





5 0
3 years ago
What was on effect of the New Deal?
sweet [91]

Answer:

He thought they weakened the power of the United States Congress.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which major battle of the Revolutionary War is described below?
KIM [24]
The description most likely tells that it would be the siege of Yorktown, so your answer would be D. Yorktown
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plzzzzzzzzzz i need this by tomorrow
FrozenT [24]
<h3>Native American slavery “is a piece of the history of slavery that has been glossed over,” says Linford D. Fisher, associate professor of history at Brown University. “Between 1492 and 1880, between 2 and 5.5 million Native Americans were enslaved in the Americas in addition to 12.5 million African slaves.”</h3>
<h3>While natives had been forced into slavery and servitude as early as 1636, it was not until King Philip’s War that natives were enslaved in large numbers, Fisher writes in the study. The 1675 to 1676 war pitted Native American leader King Philip, also known as Metacom, and his allies against the English colonial settlers.</h3>
<h3>During the war, New England colonies routinely shipped Native Americans as slaves to Barbados, Bermuda, Jamaica, the Azores, Spain, and Tangier in North Africa, Fisher says.</h3><h3>In 1721, 45 years after the end of King Philip’s War, the Connecticut General Assembly took up the question of second-generation Native American child slaves. The Native American children who had been placed as servants in English households after the war had grown up and had children of their own. What should be done with them? Fisher writes that while leaders did not approve of enslaving them, they also did not want to set them free, so that generation of children also became indentured servants.</h3>
<h3>Native Americans sold overseas occasionally made it back to the United States, Fisher writes. Others died or disappeared into a wider slave market and labor force, or became established in the locations where they were sent, like the modern-day community of individuals in Bermuda who claim New England Indian descent.</h3><h2>The Boston Massacre was not really a massacre, but more like a riot. In fact only five people died.</h2><h2>One of the most common myths is that the BM was the event that led to the Revolutionary War. In fact, many important events led up to the massacre. It was called a massacre by the use of propaganda. It mainly started by the British trying to enforce laws.</h2><h2>British Soldiers were sent to America to enforce the Proclamation and to maintain order but their presence just made matter worse.</h2><h2>It all started March 5 by a couple of boys throwing snowballs at British soldiers. A crowd soon gathered throwing ice and making fun of them. Soon after, the British started firing wildly. Other weapons were clubs, knives, swords, and a popular weapon, your own bare hands.</h2><h2>The people that died are: Crispus Attacks, one of the more famous people who was an African American sailor, Samuel Gray, a worker at rope walk, James Caldwell, a mate on a American ship, Samuel Maverick, who was a young seventeen year old male, and Patrick Carr, a feather maker.</h2><h2>The purpose of the Boston Massacre was to try to make liberal and moderate people become radicals. It was really an accident and the radicals tried to use propaganda and turn something small into something big. The British soldiers were accused of Murder and manslaughter. To represent them was John Adams, a relative of Samuel Adams. Adams wanted the trial to get over and didn’t want the truth to come out. The Boston Massacre and misleading visual representation by Paul Revere could have been one cause of a later war.</h2><h2>The BM increased the hatred between the Americans and the British. The radical people tried to use this minor event as propaganda. Paul Revere and Samuel Adams were happy the few colonists died because they used it as propaganda so the colonist would get mad at the British. Whenever the word propaganda is used it means the truth is stretched</h2>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the ruling the US Supreme Court made that ended the legal challenges to the presidential election of 2000
iris [78.8K]

The correct answer is Bush v. Gore.

In Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court ended legal challenges to the 2000 Presidential election.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did states limit the voting rights of certain groups of people
    5·1 answer
  • What are the two major peninsulas in southwest asia?
    6·1 answer
  • What made the Pennsylvania colony unique?
    7·2 answers
  • Napoleon 111 was the ruler of France during all of the following events except?
    5·1 answer
  • What government body was established in 1970 to "protect human health and the environment?"?
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains the outcome of Roe v Wade
    9·2 answers
  • which technological feat of Rome was most impressive or most historically significant? Why (answer in 4-6 sentences) please i re
    5·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court check a law by declaring it ... <br> Unrealistic<br> Unconstitutional<br> Unviable
    9·1 answer
  • Why did African Americans become loyalists?
    9·1 answer
  • Pls help quick due in 30 minutes
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!