1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex_Xolod [135]
2 years ago
12

Money is shared out between Paul and Helen in the ratio of 3:4 Helen receives £16 How much did Helen receive

History
1 answer:
sattari [20]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Paul share = £12

Explanation:

Given:

Sharing ratio = 3:4

Helen receives = £16

Find:

How much did Paul receive

Computation:

Paul share = 3/(3+4)

Paul share = 3/7

Total amount = 16[7/4]

Total amount = 28

Paul share = 28[3/7]

Paul share = £12

You might be interested in
Why does tubman results undergroud trips worth this risk involved why or why not?
Lynna [10]

Answer:

Harriet Tubman is perhaps the most well-known of all the Underground Railroad's “conductors.” During a ten-year span, she made 19 trips into the South and escorted over 300 slaves to freedom. And, as she once proudly pointed out to Frederick Douglass, in all of her journeys she “never lost a single passenger.”  Harriet Tubman, too, believed that all men and women are born free.  Hence, it was worth the risk each time she made a trip to the South to gather slaves.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
45. What did Britain do in response to the Great Depression?
Airida [17]

The Britain decided to make a economy

7 0
2 years ago
Numbers, supplies, strategy, and spirit turned the tide of WWI. <br><br> True <br> False
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mary’s role is always to bring christians closer to christ and the father through the Spirit,As a Catholic Christian,how will yo
valina [46]

Answer:

By helping them and making them happy...

5 0
3 years ago
Compare the similarities and differences in the development of the Chesapeake and New England colonies, accounting for why the m
JulijaS [17]

Answer:

Below is my <u><em>entire</em></u> essay.

Explanation: The colonies, for the most part, were all in it together to benefit for the best of each others success. However, not all of the colonies could function the same. The New England colonies and Chesapeake colonies were both similar in the sense of their relationships with American Indians, however their economies, founding's, and overall factors of functioning are very different from each other.

   The New England colonies had much different land and climate than the Chesapeake colonies. New England had rocky, thin soil that was far from prime for agriculture to be a playing part in the economy. So, New England resorted to lumbering, trading and fishing to keep up and have an active part in the overall economy of the colonies. On the other hand, the Chesapeake colonies were solely based on trading and agriculture. They had relied heavily on the growth of tobacco as it was extremely popular, and their weather, soil and terrain was perfect for its production.

      These colonies were also founded on different beliefs. The New England colonies were dominantly puritan. A puritan was a member of a religious reform movement known as Puritanism that arose within the Church of England in the late 16th century. They wanted to get away from the Church of England and started based their reform of church in the New England colonies. Unlike solidly Puritan New England, the Chesapeake colonies presented an assortment of religions. The presence of Quakers, Mennonites, Lutherans, Dutch Calvinists, and Presbyterians made the dominance of one faith next to impossible. 

    These colonies were similar, however, in the fact that they originally wanted to be allies with the natives who were there before them. They traded with them and it seemed that everything was going smooth, but and the colonists kept encroaching on their territory so wars broke out like the French-American Indian war and Rebellions like Bacon's Rebellion.

Overall, the colonies shared the same objectives and wanted to succeed as a whole, but they had different approaches to their economic successes. 

   

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which answer explains a problem the federal government has with implementing the emancipation proclamation after the civil war?
    6·1 answer
  • In 1862 King ______________________ appointed a wealthy landowner, Otto von Bismarck (1815-1898), as his prime minister. Bismarc
    12·1 answer
  • Which if the following shows a similarity in the business practices of John D. Rockefeller and Andrew carnegie l?
    9·2 answers
  • Information that is unedited, unfiltered, and provides a record of a specific action or event falls into what informational cate
    10·1 answer
  • Ill give u branliest help me
    10·1 answer
  • Why was the Republican Party created ?
    5·1 answer
  • Which TWO quotes by George Washington reflect precedents he implemented?
    13·1 answer
  • What roles do courts play in society?
    8·1 answer
  • Did citrus fruit originate in new world or old world?
    11·1 answer
  • True or False. When slaves rebelled, even in small ways, they were met
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!