Chavez holds the US government responsible for minorities' difficulties. Option A is the right answer.
<h3>Who exactly is Hugo Chavez?</h3>
Cesar Chavez was a labor leader and civil rights campaigner in the United States (US). In his mind, left-wing politics and Roman Catholic social education were inextricably linked.
He began his working life as a manual laborer before joining the US Navy for two years.
He mostly blamed the US government for minorities' difficulties, claiming that the US had a large amount of poverty, a lack of education, and a poor educational system.
In the United States, some minorities face a slew of challenges. As a result, Chavez pointed the finger at the US administration.
As a result, option A is right.
For more information about the minorities, refer below
brainly.com/question/27125627
Answer:
Texas war for independence (1835-1836)
Causes:
- The 1835 Constitution, promulgated by the Mexican government, which replaced the 1824 Constitution. This Constitution changed the federal government system of Mexico for a centralized system. For this reason, Texas lost its political autonomy.
- The 1835 Constitution banned slavery in Mexican territory, causing a great impact on the texan economy.
- Trade between Texas and the US was increasing at that time.
Effects:
- Independence of the Republic of Texas, recognized by the signing of the Velasco Treaty (Mexico did not recognize Texas as an independent state).
- There were numerous human casualties on both sides, product of the battles.
Aroostook war (1838-1839)
Causes:
- The border between the state of Maine (USA) and the British colony of New Bronswick (British North America) was not clearly defined.
Effects:
- The 1841 Webster-Ashburton treaty defined the territorial boundary between the state of Maine and the British colony of New Brunswick permanently.
- The conflict had a diplomatic solution, so there were no human casualties.
Explanation:
Hello!
Comparing both situations, we can understand:
Causes:
- In both cases, the main cause of the conflict responds to an economic factor, which is derived from the use of a disputed land.
- The Texan settlers (Americans and Mexicans) acted jointly. The inhabitants of the Aroostook region were considered intruders by one side or another.
Effects:
- In both cases, limits were defined for the territories in conflict.
- Texas revolt produced many human casualties. Aroostook war didn´t.
