Ask question

Ask question

All categories

4 years ago

13

To stoics, ______ should not be considered a bad thing because it has been predestined by God and therefore must be considered g

ood.
a. death
b. hedonism
c. life
d. all of these

1 answer:

Evgen [1.6K]4 years ago

8 0

I’m not completely positive, but it may be d. all of these because usually when all of the above is an option, that’s the answer

You might be interested in

Asking questions, recognizing deception, recognizing verbal signals and nonverbal signals,

Mkey [24]

Answer:

interviewing

Explanation:

becaise all the three are the types of law and and spy and crime place

<em><u>H</u></em><em><u>O</u></em><em><u>P</u></em><em><u>E</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>I</u></em><em><u>T</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>H</u></em><em><u>E</u></em><em><u>L</u></em><em><u>P</u></em><em><u>A</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Y</u></em><em><u>O</u></em><em><u>U</u></em>

4 0

3 years ago

explain the goals of judges and courts in working with children and families in the foster care system

Readme [11.4K]

Answer: trying to help the children

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

is there still a threat from the Middle East and has it been resolved with the death of Osama bin Laden

shusha [124]

The Middle East and America have had issues even before the attacks on 9/11. These issues became bigger once the attacks happened. America has continued to claim that countries in the Middle East are supporting terrorists and sheltering them in their countries. The problems have yet to be resolved even after the killing of bin Laden.

4 0

3 years ago

The Court has established a three-part test to define obscenity, including applying “local community standards” in determining w

11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer:

The Miller Test is the primary legal test for determining whether expression constitutes obscenity. It is named after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. California (1973). The Miller test faced its greatest challenge with online obscenity cases. In Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002), a case challenging the constitutionality of the Child Online Protection Act, several justices questioned the constitutionality of applying the local community standards of Miller to speech on the Internet. In this photo, Associate Legal Director of the ACLU Ann Beeson gestures during a news conference outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 2, 2004 in Washington. The ACLU claimed COPA violated the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. They challenged the law on behalf of online bookstores, artists and others, including operators of Web sites that offer explicit how-to sex advice or health information. The Supreme Court agreed with the lower court’s ruling that COPA did not pass the strict scrutiny test used to judge obscenity cases. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, used with permission from the Associated Press)

Explanation:

d

6 0

3 years ago

stiks02 [169]

Answer:

hakdogggggggggg

Explanation:

nbvdiinvnanajja

8 0

4 years ago