1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BlackZzzverrR [31]
3 years ago
11

Arkostik sa propaganda​

History
1 answer:
Arisa [49]3 years ago
3 0

Answer :

Ano ang naging epekto ng kaisipang liberal sa Plipinas? 2. Anong pamamaraan ang ginamit ng mga Kilusang Propaganda sa paghingi ng pagbabago? 3. Ano ang ginamit

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Write a three paragraph editorial about wilsons war message
weeeeeb [17]

Answer:Explanation: On the 3d of February last I officially laid before you the extraordinary announcement of the Imperial German Government that on and after the 1st day of February it was its purpose to put aside all restraints of law or of humanity and use its submarines to sink every vessel that sought to approach either the ports of Great Britain and Ireland or the western coasts of Europe or any of the ports controlled by the enemies of Germany within the Mediterranean. That had seemed to be the object of the German submarine warfare earlier in the war, but since April of last year the Imperial Government had somewhat restrained the commanders of its undersea craft in conformity with its promise then given to us that passenger boats should not be sunk and that due warning would be given to all other vessels which its submarines might seek to destroy, when no resistance was offered or escape attempted, and care taken that their crews were given at least a fair chance to save their lives in their open boats. The precautions taken were meagre and haphazard enough, as was proved in distressing instance after instance in the progress of the cruel and unmanly business, but a certain degree of restraint was observed The new policy has swept every restriction aside. Vessels of every kind, whatever their flag, their character, their cargo, their destination, their errand, have been ruthlessly sent to the bottom without warning and without thought of help or mercy for those on board, the vessels of friendly neutrals along with those of belligerents. Even hospital ships and ships carrying relief to the sorely bereaved and stricken people of Belgium, though the latter were provided with safe-conduct through the proscribed areas by the German Government itself and were distinguished by unmistakable marks of identity, have been sunk with the same reckless lack of compassion or of principle.

I was for a little while unable to believe that such things would in fact be done by any government that had hitherto subscribed to the humane practices of civilized nations. International law had its origin in the at tempt to set up some law which would be respected and observed upon the seas, where no nation had right of dominion and where lay the free highways of the world. By painful stage after stage has that law been built up, with meagre enough results, indeed, after all was accomplished that could be accomplished, but always with a clear view, at least, of what the heart and conscience of mankind demanded. This minimum of right the German Government has swept aside under the plea of retaliation and necessity and because it had no weapons which it could use at sea except these which it is impossible to employ as it is employing them without throwing to the winds all scruples of humanity or of respect for the understandings that were supposed to underlie the intercourse of the world. I am not now thinking of the loss of property involved, immense and serious as that is, but only of the wanton and wholesale destruction of the lives of noncombatants, men, women, and children, engaged in pursuits which have always, even in the darkest periods of modern history, been deemed innocent and legitimate. Property can be paid for; the lives of peaceful and innocent people can not be. The present German submarine warfare against commerce is a warfare against mankind.

It is a war against all nations. American ships have been sunk, American lives taken, in ways which it has stirred us very deeply to learn of, but the ships and people of other neutral and friendly nations have been sunk and overwhelmed in the waters in the same way. There has been no discrimination. The challenge is to all mankind. Each nation must decide for itself how it will meet it. The choice we make for ourselves must be made with a moderation of counsel and a temperateness of judgment befitting our character and our motives as a nation. We must put excited feeling away. Our motive will not be revenge or the victorious assertion of the physical might of the nation, but only the vindication of right, of human right, of which we are only a single champion.

Explanation:

finelly im finish :)

7 0
4 years ago
What is a sect?
Bond [772]
A. A branch of a larger religious group.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. The colonist already knew their weapons and supplies were in jeopardy and had moved them to other secret locations before the
Roman55 [17]
A threatened because in jeopardy means to be threatened in a way
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How can the government of Caesar Augustus best be described? It was a republic; therefore, Augustus did not hold all of the powe
Vikentia [17]

Answer:

There was a senate; however, Augustus maintained power over all bodies of government.

Explanation:

After the death of his uncle Julius Caesar, Caesar Augustus became the ruler of the Roman empire. He was the adopted son of Julius Caesar who made him his heir after his death.

Augustus brought an autocratic form of government after he became the ruler. He put all major power on himself, overlooking major decision making upon himself. There was a senate in the empire but they were more or less powerless under Augustus who took the role of major decision making to himself.  

Thus, the correct answer is the fourth or last option.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write in at least two paragraphs everything what you know about Guatemala and the Maya Civilization. Already got one.need help
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

The Aztec culture from Central Mexico usually is the one associated with human sacrifice, but that’s probably because Spanish chroniclers were there to witness it. The Maya were just as bloodthirsty when it came to feeding their gods. The Maya city-states fought frequently with one another and many enemy warriors were taken captive. These captives were usually enslaved or sacrificed. High-level captives such as nobles or kings were forced to play in the ceremonial ball game against their captors, re-enacting the battle they lost. After the game, the outcome of which was predetermined to reflect the battle it represented, the captives were ritually sacrificed.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was one of wu Zhao accomplishment as ruler of the tang dynasty
    7·1 answer
  • What were the goals of the Tet Offensive?
    15·2 answers
  • What strategy did Bismarck use to make Germany a unified and powerful nation?
    5·2 answers
  • Which geographic feature most aided England
    7·1 answer
  • Helpppppppppppppp!!!!!????¿
    10·1 answer
  • What were the causes and effects of the compromise of 1850? I need help :(
    8·2 answers
  • How did terrace farming help farmer during the Neolithic Revolution?
    5·2 answers
  • What agreement did Reagan and Gorbachev make at the end of the Cold War?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the allies deal with the issue of war crimes ineurope
    9·1 answer
  • how did the differences between the native, americans and the colonists lead to the english colonists being able to obtain so mu
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!