<span>A. It established federal emissions standards
</span>The enactment of the Clean Air Act of 1970 (1970 CAA) resulted in a major shift in the federal government's role in air pollution<span> control. This legislation authorized the development of comprehensive federal and state regulations to limit </span>emissions<span> from both stationary (industrial) sources and mobile sources.</span>
Answer:
reactive
Explanation:
Societies who made reactive change only make it in order to adapt Rather than do it for a certain cause or principles.
In the example above, BP's already know that their method of over exploitation could possess a risk for oil spilling, and yet they did not make the necessary effort to prevent it.
After the explosion occurred and the spilled oil damaged the nearby environment, BP decided to make a change by containing surface oil and Utilizing chemical oil dispersal to separate the oil that is spilled underwater.
BP made the change in reaction after the accident occured, not before. Which is why we consider this as a reactive change.
My guess would be A, but I'm not 100% sure so you should probs check that.
You mean what possible advantage could Oligarchy have?
Oligarchy could mean that people in power will have good education and for example won't be manipulated by populists. For example often people choose their representatives based on very little information, and in an oligarchy, where a small portion of a society (the riches and best educated) rules, it could be more likely that the rulers will have the necessary education and preparaation.
As we do not have access to this text, we cannot provide examples, citations or references of this text. However, we are able to look at what servant leadership is and how it is exercised in the world.
Servant leadership is a philosophy of leadership in which a person is considered a leader because he serves. This kind of leader puts the needs of his employees first. Moreover, his main focus is that of helping the employees thrive and develop as much as possible. According to this philosophy, instead of the people working to serve the leader, the leader exists to serve the people.
