Answer:
I'm guessing it's the last option
Explanation:
Process of elimination, also that's just how things were
Under Aleksandr Vasilevsky, the Soviet Union invaded Manchukuo.
Jake isjfnd fbdb346678&6790
Answer:
The National Party was elected in 1948 on the policy of Apartheid ('separateness'). This 'separateness' put South Africans of different racial groups on their own paths in a partitioned system of development.
Explanation:
<h3>Effects of the Group Areas Act</h3>
The GAA had strange implications for governance and responsibility as it became more elaborate and amended. For example, the Coloured townships of Coronationville, Noordgesig, Newclare, Riverlea, and Western Township are administrated by Johannesburg City Council while Bosmont is the responsibility of the Department of Community Development (South African Institute of Race Relations, 1964: 216). The work of welfare organizations was made more difficult by the GAA, like Lunalegwaba House, a group home for African boys, in Johannesburg could not operate because the regulations of the GAA did not allow the White charity to own the property (South African Institute for Race Relations, 1967: 306). People attempted to use the courts to overturn the GAA, though each time they were unsuccessful (Dugard, 1978, 324). Others decided to use civil disobedience and other protests, like ‘sit-ins’ at restaurants, were experienced across South Africa in the early 60s. The 'sit-ins' were not ill-received by the average White citizen, which the South African Institute of Race Relations believed proved that they did not object to sharing restaurants with the other racial groups (1961: 183). There was also resistance from Cape Town City Council who voted before 1964 to keep District Six and the central business district not dedicated to any one racial group; they had the support of the Cape Town Chamber of Commerce on this decision (South African Institute of Race Relations, 1964: 213).
Poverty
Poverty and joblessness are key problems for many of the Native American groups across the United States, and New Mexico is no exception. According the the US Census Bureau, 27% of all Native Americans live in poverty. In reporting done in 2012 in New Mexico, 40% of all Native American children (under age 18) in the state were living in households below the poverty level defined by the federal government. 22% of all Native American children in New Mexico were shown to be living in households where the parent(s) were without employment.
