This is another excuse that the Captain Beatty gives to Montag for why destroying books is good for the society. According to him, any person can potentially be offended by a subject, also he argues that all books are better off destroyed than allowed to incite anger. Captain Beatty uses an example of a book and linking it tobacco and cancer. Something curious is that he shows the benefit of destroying information about lung cancer to keep cigarette companies happy, but there are risks that we can see since people will be less informed of what smoking can do.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
B.It can demonstrate his motivation
Explanation:
got it correct on Edge
Answer:
I think it is 3rd one
the melody kept playing in my min
as though I am not sure
but it can be correct
hope it helps you....^^
Either B or D...I’m leaning more towards D though
Hope this helps
-AaronWiseIsBae
The detail that best reveals that Rainsford oppose Zaroff's idea is this:THANK YOU, I AM A HUNTER, NOT A MURDERER.
The hunting principles of General Zaroff appeared too harsh to Rainsford and they are quite contrary to his own hunting philosophy. Rainsford is of the opinion that the General was actually carrying out an act of murdering rather than hunting.
