1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elina [12.6K]
3 years ago
13

All of the following are true concerning the home front during World War II EXCEPT

History
1 answer:
bulgar [2K]3 years ago
7 0
I’m pretty sure it’s 2
You might be interested in
How can propaganda be used to galvanize a movement?
tamaranim1 [39]
The answwer to ur question is d
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the election of 1876 affect reconstruction?
Liono4ka [1.6K]
Good morning!

The Reconstruction ended with President Rutherford's order for federal troops to leave the southern states. Thus, with Rutherford's election in 1876, in one of the most disputed elections in the history of the United States of America, Reconstruction was at an end.
Hugs!
4 0
3 years ago
The United States emerged as an Imperialist power following
kherson [118]

Answer:

the united states emerged following the spanish merica war

B

8 0
3 years ago
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Why was the controversy over the decision to annex Hawaii?
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Some reasons were that Native Hawaiians were against U.S. annexation, and the controversy of how US marines used force against the Queen Liliuokalani of Hawaii (held her at gunpoint) and also the fact that President Grover Cleveland himself was against annexation.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Modernized japan included all of the following except
    13·1 answer
  • Who invented the skateboard
    9·1 answer
  • What does Winston Churchill claim that the Soviet Union wanted /10327012/aa7c0bf7?utm_source=registration
    13·1 answer
  • How did the founding fathers ensure that the people would be accurately represented in the House of Representatives? A. They dec
    6·2 answers
  • PLS HELP ME I NEED THIS DONE FOR CLASS TOMORRW AND IM STRESSING REALLY BADLY
    12·2 answers
  • Help me with my work pleas
    13·2 answers
  • Based on the maps, what accounts for the growth of ship building in the New England and Middle colonies?
    9·1 answer
  • What is life like in the Sahara Dessert?<br> A-Wet and humid<br> B-Dry and hot<br> C-Cold and snow
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think these
    12·1 answer
  • 9. Which of the following are nonlegislative powers held by state legislatures? Select all that apply. (3 points)
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!