Answer:
An experiment to test whether drinking alcohol influences people's tendency to become socially aggressive is written below in complete detail.
Explanation:
Experimental hypothesis:
In this research, if teenagers between 16 to 19, absorb 100% agave tequila, then they convert socially aggressive.
Dependent variable: social aggressiveness.
Autonomous variable: 100% agave tequila consumption.
the research group became aggressive after absorbing 100% agave tequila and finished up arguing with each other at each party.
Answer: b) bring an ally to the meeting.
Explanation: As per the situation mentioned in the question, Jane persists minority opinion for the dorm curfew which she can express in the meeting by displaying her opinion through ally. Ally is the community of other people who have similar thinking about dorm curfew so that she can convince majority opinionated people about her thoughts .In this manner she will not be forced to conform towards majority opinion.
Other options are incorrect because display of negative emotions will not change the mind of majority opinion. Interdependent thinking is viewing and relating with the natural connection and bringing cookies are not the appropriate and relevant steps for the case.Thus, the correct option is option(b).
Explanation:
Most civilizations developed from agrarian communities that provided enough food to support cities. Cities intensified social hierarchies based on gender, wealth, and division of labor. Some developed powerful states and armies, which could only be maintained through taxes.
<span>Well the answer is simple if you look at it from an economic standpoint. Say the oil poor country is unable to develop energy sources that move away from having to use oil to get energy, the oil rich country comes in and sees a great trade opportunity.
Basically here's how it works:
- Oil Rich country offers trade
- The two nations bargain for the price of the commodity being sold
- Both parties reach an agreement
- Oil Rich country starts exporting excess oil to oil poor country
- Oil poor country pays oil rich country
- Oil poor country uses purchased oil to provide power to citizens
- Oil rich country has more money in its coffers for government projects
As you can see, the oil poor country gets the benefit of having oil (which in this day is more valuable than gold sometimes), while the oil rich country gets more money to spend how it wants.
Look at the United Arab Emirates, and more specifically the city of Dubai. They BUILT islands that look like palm trees, with multi million dollar homes on them. They just have that much money. Heck, the princes of the UAE and Saudi Arabia (two of the most oil rich countries in the world) are worth more than Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, the entire Apple, and Microsoft companies combined.
Hope this helps you!
</span>http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/534b3f6de4b01a36187871ca
Answer:
The Sedition Act was not constitutional. The first amendment of the Constitution protected peoples' right to freedom of speech. It allowed people the freedom to practice different religions, to report events, to speak out against the government, and more. The Sedition Act went directly against the first amendment by making it illegal to speak out against the government.
Explanation:
The first amendment of the constitution is this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."