Answer:
Option D, HFCs and HCFCs are less likely to deplete stratospheric ozone and contribute less to global warming than CFCs do
Explanation:
HFCs have the ability to replace CFCs. They are able to deplete the stratospheric ozone because they have chlorine. However, their ozone depletion potentials (ODPs) is quite less as compared to that of CFCs. HCFCs ozone depletion potentials (ODPs) is between 0.01 to 0.1 while that of CFCs is around 1. Hence, HCFCs deplete less stratospheric ozone and hence their contribution to global warming is comparatively low
Hence, option D is correct
Auto insurance companies offer discounts if you are good student, or full time student (which includes your gpa).
grants and scholarships are rewarded by good grades and succession of essay writing.
students will get kicked off their athletic team if their GPA is too low.
That singles out comparing yourself to your friends, which should be obvious that this one's excluded. ☺
Bc they are only out for a limited amount of time
Answer:
Create clear and concise documents
Explanation:
I just took the test 100% correct.
Answer:
The United States should increase domestic manufacturing to promote prosperity.
Explanation:
Excerpt:
“The creation of a home market is not only necessary to procure for our agriculture a just reward of its labors, but it is indispensable to obtain a supply of our necessary wants. . . . Suppose no actual abandonment of farming, but, what is most likely, a gradual and imperceptible employment of population in the business of manufacturing, instead of being compelled to resort to agriculture. . . . Is any part of our common country likely to be injured by a transfer of the theatre of [manufacturing] for our own consumption from Europe to America?
“. . . Suppose it were even true that Great Britain had abolished all restrictions upon trade, and allowed the freest introduction of the [products] of foreign labor, would that prove it unwise for us to adopt the protecting system? The object of protection is the establishment and perfection of the [manufacturing] arts. In England it, has accomplished its purpose, fulfilled its end. . . . The adoption of the restrictive system, on the part of the United States, by excluding the [products] of foreign labor, would extend the [purchasing] of American [products], unable, in the infancy and unprotected state of the arts, to sustain a competition with foreign fabrics. Let our arts breathe under the shade of protection; let them be perfected as they are in England, and [then] we shall be ready . . . to put aside protection, and enter upon the freest exchanges.”
Henry Clay, speaker of the House of Representatives, speech in Congress, 1824
