Okay well Caesar and Brutus were friends of course. When Brutus decides to join the conspirators in their plot to kill Caesar. The second downfall is that he refused to listen to Cassius. Cassius told Brutus to kill Antony along with Caesar but he did not want the conspirators to appear as butchers so he allowed Antony to live And the last downfall is when he gave Antony permission to speak at Caesars funeral Again Cassius warned Brutus not to let Antony speak Cassius feared that Antony would turn the people against the conspirators and that exactly what happened Brutus had to flea for his life which ultimately lead to his dead.
I would say, D) Both are outwardly beautiful, but of less value internally.
Rhetoric usually works through the emotive, or rhetorical force of words and phrases<span>—the emotional associations they express and elicit. Rhetoric is used to influence our beliefs and attitudes. In fact, rhetoric can be more effective than argument when it comes to influencing someone’s belief’s and attitudes. But it shouldn’t be. Rhetoric may be psychologically powerful, but by itself it establishes nothing.</span>
B or C I am not sure
But that’s gonna help you
Hello!
The one way the Maze Runner and the Hunger Games are notably similar is the "survival" story-line that is implemented but the Maze Runner is more along the lines of a post-apocalypse story. The Hunger Games is more along the lines of a post-war story line but that part of the story (the separation of the Districts) is not seen/told until much later. Also, Both involve the killing of innocent children/adolescents by the authorities in charge as a means to find peace. The Hunger Games looks to use the “competition” to control the population and prevent an uprising. The Maze Runner (series not first film) is about finding a cure for civilization.
<span>Hoped that Helped! :)</span>
