The answer is B. You subtract the profit and income and you should get 33,345.
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Ticket location is the most important attributes in the overall purchase decision. It is with a 39.49% of the general choice weight.
2. Verily, the conjoint assessment results are important in choosing assessing decisions. Ticket cost contained 38% of the examination. From the data, we can conclude fans are increasingly loath to purchase $60 tickets. By joining this ticket cost with various characteristics with higher utility scores, we can deliver a group that will be impressively all the more addressing the fans. The proportionate should be conceivable with the other evaluating decisions to make various group offers .The Portland Trail Blazers' NBA foundation was in a terrible position. Fans were spilling out the door, and the players couldn't find the bushel. The gathering wore a 22-36 record and advance managers presently ran its home, the Rose Garden after its owners had proclaimed money related indebtedness. The gathering's guide had been ended for sure. The field had been a sellout just three years earlier, and the gathering had been dear by Portland. However, starting in the 2003 season, interest began to fall pointedly by more than 15 percent by 2005. In the midst of a comparative time, 42 of 70 indulgence suites sat void in the midst of the period. More Portland crowd individuals viewed the atmosphere by then Blazers' amusements.
3. Yes there could be more than one.
By looking at the conjoint assessment and other data open from the survey, I believe that the Portland Trail Blazers the officials should offer two unmistakable packs. One being either six or ten redirections for each group. Disregarding the way that organization lean towards the six preoccupation pack, giving fans the decisions to buy for ten diversions will empower the gathering to sell more tickets. Regarding seating, they should offer the mid 300 court seats, averaging between $40-50
It depends what for... but If its really important, u would say 50,000
Answer:
C. All else being equal, the growth rate of the dividends is greater than 2%
Explanation:
The formula to calculate the fair price of a stock with a constant growth in dividends is as follows,
- P = D1 / r-g
- Where D1 is the dividend next period
- r is the required rate of return
- g is the growth rate in dividends
- P = 1.5 / 0.1 - 0.02 = 18.75
- We are taking 1.5 as D1 as it is the dividend per share DeepMind will pay next year.
So, we will be willing to pay more than 18.75 if the fair price per share today is greater than 18.75. We check all the 3 options.
A. say the required rate is 10.1%
- P = 1.5 / (0.101 - 0.02) = 18.52
- So if the required rate of return increases from 10%, the fair price per share is falling and we will be willing to pay less than 18.75 per share.
B. P = 1.2 / (0.1 - 0.02) = 15
- If D1 = 1.2,the fair price per share will be 15 which is less so we will not be willing to pay more than 15 for such share.
C. Say the growth rate in dividends is 2.1%
- P = 1.5 / (0.1 - 0.021) = 18.99
- The fair price per share increased to 18.99 if the growth rate in dividend increases by 0.1 percentage point. Thus, C is the correct answer
Answer:
There will be a difference in the income .
Absorption costing income will be lower as it transfers all the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
Variable costing income will be higher as it does not transfer the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
The difference will be of $ 104000
Explanation:
Increase in units 8000
Variable Fixed
Unit manufacturing costs of the period $24.00 $10.00
Unit operating expenses of the period 8.00 3.00
Total Unit Costs $ 32.00 $ 13.00
The net operating income under variable costing for the year will be $ 13* 8000= $ 104000 Lower than the net operating income under absorption costing. This is because the all fixed costs will be treated as period cost rather than product costs.
In variable costing the ending inventory will be $104000 lower than the ending inventory under absorption costing because the fixed costs will not be allocated to products.
Under variable costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32 each.Under absorption costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32+ $ 13= $ 45 each.
