Answer:
$0
Explanation:
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the possibility of deducting casualty losses if they were not caused by federally declared natural disasters. The only way Mary could deduct the $25,000 loss is that she had some type of casualty gain during the year that is offset by this loss. Casualty gains result when a person receives more money from an insurance company due to an event, e.g. fire, than the basis of the property. But in this case, there is no prior casualty gain, so the casualty loss cannot be deducted.
Answer:
Explanation:
F denote the event that the respondent is female and A denote the event that the respondent uses social media and other websites to voice opinions about television programs.
Two events are said to be independent if both events can occur together at the same time, that is the probability of one event occurring does not affect the probability of the other event occurring. Events F and A are independent event because both F and A can occur the same time simultaneously. And also if F occurs, it does not affect the occurrence of A.
Answer:
government revenue $148,071,428,860
Explanation:
Theincremental price is 0.75/3.50 = 0,2142857
from that we get that Quantity demanded will be of
150 billion x (1 + 0.2142857 x -0.06) = 148.0714286
Now that we got the quantity of gallon sold we multiply by the tax of $1 per gallon thus, 148,071,428,860 will be the revenue for the government
Answer:
I beleive this one would be a bit of a matter of opinion when it comes down to it, but personally I would call it a bit unethical.
Explanation:
Escpecially when it comes to something like medication, it feels unethical to be advertising yourself as the only brand that will work. In my mind unique selling proposition would be focusing on what differentiates your product from others (example, my product can provide 48 hour vs other brands that only offer 24 hour) Simply stating their brand is the only solution feels unethical and does not provide ample evidence of this claim to customers in my opinion. I don't think it would be considered illegal, but in my mind its tiptoeing the line of ethics.
Answer:
The answer is 14%
Explanation:
Formula for Future value (FV) FV = PV (1+ni)
Whereas FV= Future value, PV = present value, n= number of years, i= TVOM in percentage
Rearranging the formula for i
i = (FV/PV)-1
So, i = (5,700/5,000)-1
i = 1.14-1
i = 0.14
i = 14%
(0.14x100=14%)
