The primary weakness of this passage is:
- D, The passage fails to make a debatable claim
<h3>What is a Debatable Claim?</h3>
A debatable claim is a thought or primary message that is arguable. A debatable claim has strong language that shows the certainty of the speaker.
The claim made in the above text is weak because it gives no room for strong academic debate.
Learn more about debatable claims here:
brainly.com/question/21661776
#SPJ1
I do not know what your question is but if you are asking what is it then it could be a pipe under water that is dripping at a constant rate underwater which is why you only find it while wearing scuba gear.
It is also called AN INTERPRETIVE CRITICAL ANALYSIS.
An interpretive critical analysis is a type of critical analysis which address the questions about the meaning and the significance of the work that is been examined.
Answer:
1. France is not as large as Brazil.
2. A river is larger than a stream.
3. Metal is not as flexible as rubber.
4. A sidewalk is less wide than a road.
5. Arithmetic is more difficult than advanced algebra.
6. A hill is not as high as a mountain.
7. Bottled water is more clear and clean than river water.
8. Cold, wet weather is not as pleasant as warm weather.
9. Sitting in an easy chair is more comfortable than sitting in a park bench.
10. Hiking along a path is less dangerous than climbing a mountain peak.
11. Toes are less long than fingers.
12. Toes are not as long as useful as fingers.
13. Fingers are more long and useful than toes.
Explanation:
"The green mug or the blue cup seem like a good choice" is the only sentence that uses a verb that agrees with its compound subject, since the others have issues with number.
