The correct answer is:
A. Solve Italy’s economic problems.
When Benito Mussolini came into power, he promised to solve Italy’s economic problems.
Benjamin Franklin was the leading figure of the American Enlightenment and a physicist with many inventions in the field of electricity, such as lightning rods, bifocal glasses, etc. He founded many civic organizations including the Library. He was also a political theorist, mason, statesman, diplomat, inventor, humorist. His father wanted Benjamin to attend a school with a priesthood, but he only had money to send him to school for two years. He attended the Boston Latin School, but he could not graduate, he continued his education only by reading a lot. While still attending school, he turned out to be very talented because in only one year from the middle class, he was reaching to the very top. His formal education ended when he was ten, after which he worked with his father for some time, starting with twelve as an assistant in the printing press with his brother. So he did not end formal education to work with his father and brother, but he started working with his father and brother, because he could not continue his education because of the financial situation.
The answer is: He failed out of school.
Answer:
Explanation:
Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.
“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.
OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.
Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.
Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….
The answer to that would be A. Criticism of traditional authority.
The Allies invaded the Mediterranean because they wanted to remove Italy from axis powers. Axis powers are nations that fought in the WW2 so they basically didn't want Italy to fight in the war.
