In the traumatic aftermath of World War One, many questioned whether man's civilization had revealed a dooming weakness, and if one of its greatest achievements—democracy—was only a fragile ideal. Did the war to make the world "safe for democracy" expose a world unfit for democracy? And what about America? For 130 years the republic had survived chronic growing pains and a murderous civil war, but was it, too, displaying signs of dissolution and rot? Voter apathy, corruption in city politics, the "tyranny of the fifty-one percent," the suppression of black voting in the South—American democracy seemed worn, cracked, and vulnerable.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
The difference between the first two parties are that the federalists wanted change and the ant-federlists did not.
one of the federlists was Thomas Jefferson.
one of the ani-federlists was Alexander Hamilton
Answer:
Explanation:
Charmian was a trusted servant and advisor to Cleopatra VII of Egypt. Contrary to what is generally believed,[by whom?] Plutarch, in his Parallel Lives biography of Mark Antony, writes that Charmion managed the principal affairs of Cleopatra's government; therefore, she held an important position in Cleopatra's trusted circle.
Answer:No
Explanation:
It seems more important to fight for a cause or a person rather then an object of money. But that’s just my Opinion:)