1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kamila [148]
2 years ago
11

Today Americans generally

History
1 answer:
DedPeter [7]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

No, Americans do not operate on the principle that the government is limited to what the constitution says it can do.

Explanation:

"Federalism in the United States is the constitutional division of power between U.S. state governments and the federal government of the United States."

Many clauses in the Constitution give different parts of the government something called implied powers. These are powers not directly stated in the Constitution. A specific example of this is the 10th Amendment, which states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people". This direct quote from the Constitution states that any powers that are not specifically given to the federal government belong to the states or the people. An example of this would be the ability of states to hold elections. States are allowed to do this because it is an implied power of the 10th amendment. So while things like airline safety and food regulations are not explicitly stated in the Constitution, there are clauses that give the federal government the implied power to do it. Because implied powers exist, Americans do not operate on the principle that the government is limited to what the constitution says it can do.

Hope this helps! You can find other examples of implied powers other than the 10th Amendment in the Constitution :)

You might be interested in
Why do historians now think that the Egyptian pyramid were not built mostly by slaves
DENIUS [597]
Because of segregation
7 0
3 years ago
How did European contact impact indigenous peoples? (Select all that apply.) European goods were traded for native lands. Native
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

The best choices from the options, to be able to answer the question: How did European contact impact indigenous peoples, would be:

B: Native tribes became ill from diseases that were not present until the arrival of Europeans. This is correct as it was not until Europeans arrived in America that such diseases as smallpox, or chickenpox, made an appearance, decimating thousands of Native Americans all over the Americas. It is now known that the arrival of diseases brought by the European settlers was one of the biggest impacts that Europe had on America.

C: Early European settlers attempted to convert Native tribes to their religion. This is especially true for all those tribes who came into contact with the Spanish conquistadores. One of the reasons why the discovery of new lands was supported originally by the Spanish crown, was the desire for the extension of the Gospels. When Columbus found these new lands, and the "savages" in them, a whole movement of Christians, particularly Catholic orders, began to move into the Americas in order to bring the Gospel. Later, with the arrival of the English in America, although at first evangelization was not the main purpose, but rather to find a new place away from religious persecution, it later did become an issue, with Puritans attempting to "civilize" the Indians through religious knowledge. After them, many of the new protestant movements made it their goal to evangelize the savage Native people of the colonies.

None of the other choices is correct, as Europeans traded with Indians for goods, not lands, and since lands were sacred to Indian tribes, they would have never traded them. Also, crops like bananas, coffee, sugar cane and wheat, were brought by the Europeans into the Americas, not taken from the Americas by the Europeans.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the impacted of the anti-slavery movement on society and politics
V125BC [204]

Answer:the south for mad the south relied on slavery

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why is the 24th amendment significant in ensuring political involvement for citizens as registered voters?
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

because it prohibited of poll taxes in federal elections.

Explanation:

the 24th admenment to the constitution of the U.S. that prohibited the federal and state governments feom imposing poll taxes before a citizen could participate in a federal election ( P.S. this is also another part you could say for your answer)

5 0
3 years ago
How did the “system of extraction” impact countries after they decolonized?
Delicious77 [7]

Answer: It effects countries after they've been decolonized as it's still taking resources away from them after leaving the control of the country up to them.

Explanation: (Hope this helps that's what I got from my History 12 course.)

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the British take control of Oudh?
    10·1 answer
  • What brass instrument is used to add weight to the lowest orchestral register?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Catalonia want to separate from Spain?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the first written constitution in american colonies?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the name of the organization who promoted the war amongst the American people?
    8·1 answer
  • (Please help asap!)<br><br> What is the economic attractiveness in Pennsylvania?
    7·1 answer
  • Which type of figurative language is shown in the sentence?
    8·2 answers
  • What is the citizenship requirement to be President?
    7·1 answer
  • The Federalists faced persecution because of their religious beliefs.<br> True<br> False
    12·1 answer
  • Two important factors that motivated
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!