The Civil Rights Movement convinced scholars that some social movements do not result from a unification of psychological needs but need to be explained by a broader socio-economical perspective. In such an explanation, the needs of the individuals do not have to coincide with the needs of the group as a whole.
Answer:
D. It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy."
Explanation:
The system of democracy which asserts that the best and brightest citizens (individuals of natural aristocracy) would provided proper representation is criticized because It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy." In a population of over 300 million people, it will be hard for the average American voter to identify individuals who are of natural aristocracy, who broke the norm and standout among their peers as such individuals may be confused by those of artificial aristocracy who have the finance, family name and obtained polished education.
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.
The goal is resource sharing
