1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fed [463]
3 years ago
6

Who writes essays for free?

History
1 answer:
andrew-mc [135]3 years ago
5 0

what kind of essay do you mean

You might be interested in
Help I will make a brainlist!!
Nina [5.8K]
The preamble sets the stage for the Constitution (Archives.gov). It clearly communicates the intentions of the framers and the purpose of the document. The preamble is an introduction to the highest law of the land; it is not the law. It does not define government powers or individual rights.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Constitution gives the federal goverment many important duties: making laws, raising money and deciding how to
Mama L [17]

Answer:

National defense is the priority job of the national government.

National defense is the only mandatory function of the national government. Most of the powers granted to Congress are permissive in nature. Congress is given certain authorities but not required by the Constitution to exercise them. For example, Article One, Section Eight gives Congress power to pass a bankruptcy code, but Congress actually did not enact bankruptcy laws until well into the 19th century.

But the Constitution does require the federal government to protect the nation. Article Four, Section Four states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” In other words, even if the federal government chose to exercise no other power, it must, under the Constitution, provide for the common defense.

National defense is exclusively the function of the national government. Under our Constitution, the states are generally sovereign, which means that the legitimate functions of government not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. But Article One, Section 10 does specifically prohibit the states, except with the consent of Congress, from keeping troops or warships in time of peace or engaging in war, the only exception being that states may act on their own if actually invaded. (This was necessary because, when the Constitution was written, primitive forms of communication and transportation meant that it could take weeks before Washington was even notified of an invasion.)

The great irony of our time is that the bigger the federal government has become, the less well it has performed its priority function of providing for the national defense. For example, Congress spent $787 billion in the “stimulus” bill last year, yet not a dime of it was spent on military procurement or modernization—despite the fact that America is in greater danger today than it has been at any time since Communism was threatening Europe in the late 1940s.

The Heritage Foundation has written extensively on the risks facing America and the state of our defenses. Here is a brief summary of the salient facts.

America has no strategy for victory in the war on terrorism—we’re not even calling it a war anymore—and the momentum has shifted to the terrorists. The outcome in Afghanistan is in doubt. If the terrorists succeed there, they can reconstitute their safe havens, plan further attacks on the United States, and threaten to gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, a bipartisan commission with the status of the 9/11 Commission, found unanimously that the terrorists would “more likely than not” develop and use a weapon of mass destruction against a Western city by 2013. The Director of National Intelligence publicly agreed with that assessment.

The international regime for controlling nuclear weapons is broken. Pakistan has a substantial and growing nuclear arsenal. Its intelligence organization has been penetrated by the Islamists. Both North Korea and Iran are steadily increasing the range, payload, and accuracy of their ballistic missiles. No one seriously believes that the Iranians will voluntarily stop their nuclear program or that the West (except perhaps the Israelis) will use force to stop them.

According to our Pacific commander, China is increasing its military strength far more quickly than our intelligence predicted. The Chinese have already acquired an arsenal of advanced fighters and missiles that threatens to deny the American Navy access to the Taiwan Strait. They are building as many as five submarines per year and have established a modern submarine base on the island of Hainan. They have announced plans to build a variety of the ships necessary to field a blue water capability.  

The American military is significantly weaker than it was at the end of the Cold War.  Most of our tankers are equally as old; they will not be replaced, if at all, until the 2030s. The Department of Defense wants to close our most modern cargo aircraft production line and will close our most sophisticated fighter line. The missile defense budget has been cut, and according to most reports, the Obama Administration will cut modernization budgets even further.

As important as it is for the federal government to restrain itself from interfering where it does not belong, it is equally important that the government perform its constitutionally mandated function of providing for the national defense.

America’s global influence is being checked and rolled back, and even the homeland is no longer safe from attack.

The situation can still be recovered, but only if our leaders understand their duty, regain their confidence, and reenergize the defense of freedom here and abroad.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the British want to expand control into the Ohio river valley in the mid 1700s
zmey [24]
"To gain access to the regions natural resources" is the one among the following choices given in the question that best describe why the <span>British wanted to expand control into the Ohio river valley in the mid 1700s. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or option "d". </span>
8 0
2 years ago
13. Why did many African Americans move North in the Great Migration?
STatiana [176]

Driven in part by economic concerns, and in part by frustration with the straitened social conditions of the South, in the 1870s African Americans began moving North and West in great numbers. In the 1890s, the number of African Americans moving to the Northeast and the Midwest was double that of the previous decade.

plz follow me

one thanks give motivation for answering

plz mark me brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the carving of new states in Africa by European powers cause conflict between ethnic groups? What long-term effect did t
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

Carving of new states in Africa by European power caused land disputes, most notably the Hutus and Tutsis, who are still in conflict to this day

Explanation:

I'm not sure if this is exactly what you're looking for, but I hope I helped :)

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does Native American culture compare to your oun culture
    7·1 answer
  • How did advanced weaponry help europe during new imperialism
    6·1 answer
  • How Christianity helped to unify the Byzantine empire
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following contributed most directly to the enactment of the law in the excerpt? -Khan Academy
    14·1 answer
  • Martin Luther was a leader of the Reformation in ______.
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP! What did the War Industries Board do? A.Hired women to work in factories. B. Managed the purchase of military
    7·1 answer
  • Who was Hammurabi, and what was his main goal?
    11·2 answers
  • Why does the first amendment matter today?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did the United States feel<br> pressure to acquire colonies?
    9·1 answer
  • African americans never held the numbers of political seats that they should have if you take into consideration population.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!