This 'short essay' is basically asking you create a piece of writing, convincing your audience of your point. For example; I firmly believe that every single country should not have nuclear bombs. In general, I'd include:
*Nuclear Bomb Simulator to give an image I how much damage it does. What this does is, people tend to hate destructive behaviours. By showing them how much damage it does, you're appealing to their sense of emotion by conjuring a sense of panic.
*Death counts from previous wars to further reinforce the emotion of panic, sadness, and awareness. Death count for those individuals who demand solid scientific evidence.
In a nutshell, basically, include statistics (supports your argument with logical data that's already proven), history from past events if possible (to appeal to one's emotions), and if possible, choose evidence that's more modernized to further prove your point. Why so? Simply because it proves that the problem still persists, no matter how advanced in technology we are. in this case, nuclear bombs are going to be dangerous, regardless of how "modernized" we all are.
A writer creates and develops characters through characterization. In direct characterization, a writer makes direct comments about a character’s nature and personality. In indirect characterization, it is up to you to draw conclusions about a character based on the character’s appearance and what he or she says and does, as well as what other characters say and do in relation to that character. Much of Homer’s characterization of Odysseus relies on indirect information from which you can draw conclusions about this epic hero.
other characters say and think about him. Use these details to examine what this information reveals about the character of Odysseus
This book talks about the issue of monopolizing the media and burning of books.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The book Fahrenheit 451 talks about the issue and the problem of burning the book because at that time of the past, the books were banned.
The deeper meaning of the book was to control the media and monopolizing the media which will have an adverse affect on the society and the generations which are to come in future where no one would be connected to each other and there would be a lot of dependence on technology.
1 and 2 are the correct answers
