As an example, I will use Woodrow Wilson to answer this questions:
Do their actions represent appropriate uses of presidential power, or examples of presidents overstepping the authority they were granted by the Constitution?
I believe that Woodrow Wilson used the presidential power in an adequate way, without overstepping the authority that was granted to him by the Constitution. He was able to pass many progressive legislation while following all necessary procedures. He was also a strong leader during the war.
How do you think the framers of the Constitution would respond to the presidency's expanded powers?
Although Wilson enjoyed significant power, I believe that the framers of the Constitution would agree with the statement that such power was necessary during times of war. Moreover, the framers would probably see that there were several instances of Wilson's power being limited by the actions of the other branches of government, such as the fact that he asked Congress for an official declaration of war in 1917, and the fact that he was unable to get the United States to join the League of Nations due to the refusal of the Senate.
In your opinion, do U.S. presidents today have too much power or not enough?
I believe that U.S. presidents today have too much power. Although the basic structure of the government remains the same as in the past, presidents today can exercise power and take actions in ways that were unimaginable in the past. For example, presidents often engage in war without the need for an official declaration of war. Moreover, presidents are able to enter treaties in an easier and faster way than ever before. Finally, presidents enjoy an unprecedented amount of media attention and money, which makes them particularly influential.
<em>Competition, is when two allies (or just random people too I guess) become rivals in order to complete a certain task first. Normally this would mean that a group of rivals are competing to earn a certain title, for example best at something, or just to make themselves look better.</em>
<em>It effect business because this creates tension often, meaning that the 2 rivaled sides are not exactly the most friendly to one another.</em>
<em>Hope this helps and have a nice day.</em>
<em>-R3TR0 Z3R0</em>
Just for some background info, Berlin was the capital of the German Reich and after 1945 the allies and Soviets split Berlin into two. After that happened people tried to escape the Soviet occupied zone of Berlin and because of this the Soviets put up a wall and blocked people from leaving. This symbolized the divide of Berlin and increased tensions between the allies(at this point called NATO) and the Soviets. The Germans did not want to suffer another war and the tensions continued to go up. To answer your question this symbolized tensions growing between the Warsaw pact and NATO because the world was literally divided right at Berlin.
They were the laborers of society, so they were the ones paving roads, building houses and cleaning trash.
1 is the correct answer
Hope this helps :D