With all the technology we have today writing doesn't seem very necessary but there are gonna be times when we have to write.
Answer:
The story I chose is On a Mountain Trail by Harry Perry Robinson.
There are two characters in this story, Jack and Gates, and Jack is the one who narrates the story. The conflict is that when they are going to Gulch City they get stuck in the mountain's trail because twenty (or even thirty, they don't know) wolves attack them and they have to defend their selves.
When you read the story you feel that it's impossible for them to get away of that situation. Jack has a gun and he shots many times but then he realises he has only one shot left and that makes you feel hopeless. At the same time, Gates says he feels awful because there's only one shot left and they can't kill themselves (he says he doesn't want to be killed by wolves).
Fortunately, they can scape and they leave the conflict behind. I believe the conflict in this story is built correctly and that you can really tell how the characters are feeling while the conflict is happening. However, I think it would be good to get to know the characters more so anyone could relate to them better.
Explanation:
To complete this exercise, you have to choose a story and then explain the story's conflict giving examples and giving a complete answer.
I chose the story On a Mountain Trail by Harry Perry Robinson, which is about a particular situation in the mountain's trail where the characters of the story have to defend their selves.
It's important to tell how you feel while reading the story because that reflects if the conflict was interesting and well written.
Answer:
Ironically, the house of a firefighter was destroyed in the blaze.
<em>I hope this helps you</em>
<em>:)</em>
Typically, you can’t but there’s always a way to look at the bright side. For example, not everything is horrible everything has its pros and cons so try to focus on the pros!
I only know a little bit about it, so the fifth amendment is the right to remain silent, Miranda rights and double jeopardy. while the six amendment it right to a speedy trial with jury for criminal cases. In that case Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping an 18 year old, they took him in without telling him his rights which means that he did not know he could remain silent, they made him talk but since they did not tell him his civil rights he won the case. Which created the Miranda rights. Now double jeopardy means that they can't accuse him of the same crime. That's all I know and I hope this helps a little, I can't cite anything cause I got this off my government teacher.
