the Supreme Court ruled that the separation of races .... racial discrimination reinforced by the federal government's actions and policies
Answer: The answer is complex and not straightforward.
Explanation:
The article relates to Churchill and Roosevelt, so is probably dated from World War 2.
Given this and the reference to the use of force by aggressive nations it is reasonable to assume that this refers to the Axis nations and their allies, primarily Germany, Japan and Italy.
What is being referred to is reflected in the policies applied to Germany and Japan at the end of World War 2. (Italy had already switched sides and deposed Mussolini).
In the post war agreements drawn up, Germany and Japan were largely demilitarised with strict control over their armed forces. In the case of West Germany their limited armed forces existed only within the context of NATO to prevent any aggressive use as was evidenced at the beginning of World War 2.
In both instances these countries were not allowed to develop or possess nuclear weapons.
Until such time as there is a global disarmament treaty, as referred to in the article, then countries which are deemed "aggressive", the losers in a conflict, by others, the winners, have arms controls imposed.
Of course this does not and has not stopped the proliferation of weapons, and conflicts throughout the world since 1945, including the aggressive policies of countries such as the UK and the USA.
In the early part of the fifteenth century, Portuguese sailors had started to explore the West African coast, spurred on by a desire for new markets and a persistent dislike of the Muslims.
There are many of them but the most common are:
1.) Photosynthesis
2.) Solar Energy
3.)Thermochemical Reactions
No the freedom of a group of people should not cause the other set of people to have less freedom.
<h3>What is the declaration of independence?</h3>
This is the article that talked about the reason why the colonists wanted to be away from the leadership of the English people in the colonies. It talked about the issues that the people faced in the hands of Britain.
Freedom is supposed to be the universal right of all the people of the world but there are times that situations may exists that may cause some people to act like they are superior than other people.
For instance was during the colonial days, and the days that there was slavery in the United States.
The conclusion is that No the freedom of a group of people should not cause the other set of people to have less freedom.
Read more on the declaration of independence here:
brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ1
