It would be a catalyst. They help increase the rate of chemical reactions.
When we perform a study, we test a specific hypothesis to see whether our hypothesis is supported by the data or not. If our hypothesis is not supported by the data, then we can argue that a specific argument (that would be important for this hypothesis) does not have a claim in scientific research.
This is more broadly meant though. Usually you need to perform multiple studies and test multiple hypothesis to be able to critique a scientific argument and see whether the claims it makes and the predictions it makes hold up in scientific research.
• Biochemical processes give rise to the complexity of life
• Much of biochemistry deals with the structures and functions of biological macromolecules.
• Such as proteins nucleic acids, carbohydrates and lipids, which provide the structure of cells and perform many functions associated with life
Answer:
1.) True
Explanation:
A scientific theory can become a scientific law, but a scientific law cannot become a scientific theory.
A scientific theory is what is made to scientific law after many trials to prove the scientific theory is true. But after they changed a scientific theory to scientific law, it can't be changed back because it has been disproved many years later.
Hope it helps.
Answer:
sorry I'm not interested.