Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
People lost faith because so many people people were praying but yet the infection didn't stop
His role is to give his noble experiment.<span />
Answer:
Texans thought that life and property were safer within the United States than in an independent Texas. Texas was also in debt and the militia wasn't as great.
After the first world war, the people of Europe wanted more than anything to preserve peace. Chamberlain wanted to avoid war.
