The question is incomplete, so the complete question is as follows:
What is an example of a reason why historical interpretations may change over time?
A. Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
B. Political scientists discover a new method of scientific research.
C. Economists may learn more about how ancient governments operated.
D. New X-ray technology proves that previous medical conclusions were incorrect.
Answer:
A). Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
Explanation:
The Archeologists works to reveal several historical interpretations on thebasis of facts gathered from primary sources of evidence.
The example that [roves chnaging interpretation over time by archeologists is that they may uncover new climate evidence which can change the earlier facts and can reveal several new things. Archeologists can change tehir views whenever they will find some new and more strong evidences.
Hence, the correct option is "A".
That america is the best in world
hope it helps
The correct answer is A. Commanders encouraged their soldiers to be as brutal as possible.
The massacre of Nanking was a series of crimes against humanity committed by the Japanese army while they were occupying the city of Nanking and its surroundings in 1937. These crimes involved killings of civilians and prisoners, torture, violations, plunder, and other several atrocities. According to different estimates, the number of dead civilians rises above 300 000. This brutality was a direct result of the orders of the Japanese commanders: prince Asaka and general Matsui, among other Japanese military leaders.
Pavlov started from the idea that there are some things that a dog does not need to learn. For example, dogs don’t learn to salivate whenever they seafood. This reflex is “hard-wired” into the dogs. The behaviorist terms, food is an unconditioned stimulus and salivation is an unconditioned response.
Hope this helped:)
cultism trust me i am a history book your welcome
