That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
Maybe not get rid of, but it would definitely be a good idea to put aside old textbooks and things like that.
David Livingstone was a Scottish missionary, whilst Cecil Rhodes was an English businessman. Both somewhat helped kick start more colonization in Africa, with Livingstone creating a general curiosity of the Nile River, while Rhodes is quoted with starting the British Imperialism in South Africa. Rhodes is technically the founder of South Africa, while Livingstone was a missionary and explorer and was very interested in social justices, such as "rags to riches" and held an anti-slavery stance.
Answer:
selectively attend to
Explanation:
Although President Obama is of mixed race, White Americans typically perceive and label him as Black. Researchers believe this happens because White observers <u>selectively attend to</u> the distinctive physical features of the less-familiar Black minority.
Assessments should cover every part of the worksite. This is to ensure that there would be proper tracking in identified danger and to have it corrected. Assessments are also done at regular intervals, usually on a weekly basis and there should be a procedure in place.
