Answer: character vs character
Explanation:
In literature, it should be known that character vs. character conflict, is when there is a conflict between two characters. The conflict can result into a physical altercation or can also result in differences between the characters.
Since Jill and Naomi are best friends, but they aren't speaking, then this is a character vs character conflict.
Answer: It was an idyllic day - sunny, warm, and perfect for a walk in the park.
She hums continuously, or all the time, and it annoys me.
The crime he committed was egregious; he’ll never recover from this horrendous scandal.
His animosity, or hatred, of his sister divided the family.
Bill felt remorse, or shame, for his harsh words.
This situation is a conundrum, a puzzle that’s difficult to solve.
Explanation:
The words meaning will usually be right by the word such as Remorse means shame, hope this helps.
The response provided considers the appeal to logic, to character, and to emotion in the analysis, as expressed in options A, B, and C and explained below.
<h3>What is a rhetorical appeal?</h3>
A rhetorical appeal is a strategy used in order to convince one's audience of something. There are three possible appeals we can use to persuade our audience:
- Appeal to logic or logos.
- Appeal to character/credibility or ethos.
- Appeal to emotion or pathos.
The sample response provided in the instructions takes all the appeals into consideration when analyzing John Muir's statement. Let's break it down here:
- He appeals to logic by giving evidence about the destruction. - Appeal to logic.
- He seems very credible because he knows about the history of individual trees. - Appeal to character.
- Finally, he makes readers want to save the trees by using strong emotional language throughout. - Appeal to emotion.
Therefore, we can select options A, B, and C as the correct answers for this question.
Learn more about rhetorical appeals here:
brainly.com/question/13734134
#SPJ1
-im here to speak for all generations to come
-to come five thousand miles to tell you adults you must change your ways.
Answer:
It raises the important question of how, and if, technology should be monitored and regulated. While there are risks and drawbacks to developing the Flying Machine, the contraption also creates a lot of beauty and releases it into the world.
Explanation: Bradbury's story introduces the concept of weighing the rewards and drawbacks of technology, as well as the negative sides of censorship, which in this case result in the death of the inventor of the Flying Machine. We rarely hear of the invention process being stopped because of negative externalities. Should that be reported and talked about more often? These are ideas that Bradbury would like for us to debate.
