Answer:
this is all in a biblical sense.
Explanation:
Mankind has not destoryed itself as technically, according to the Biblical perspective, they cannot. Good is still in the world from people who are good. if there was no good, technically there would be no evil. everybody is a sinner as that is Adam and Eve's fault. If you think about it, most people are either good or bad in their own perspective. This is why it differs. I dont think this is 10 sentences but this is the best i could think of so yeah.
Answer:
while their approach may be different these two iconic individual shared the following characteristics. which are:
1. A pursuit for the freedom of individuals despite race.
2.Justice for all individuals despite race or skin color.
3. Equality for all persons despite race or skin color.
Explanation:
These two men tried in all their daily endeavors to ensure that freedom was given to black people and all persons despite the color of their skin. Although, their approach was different because while Martin Luther King took the route of peaceful (and sometimes not so peaceful protest). Thurgood used the instrument of the law to make changes in the society. Examples can be seen to changes in the education sector which restricted people of other races from being entitled to quality education.
Also, they ensured that black people were given a chance to vote during elections. Thus, while their approaches might be different, both men ensured that people of color were seen as equal, had freedom and were entitled to justice.
Norrator point of view about the life of an adult her culture in the "excerpt from minuk :ashes in the path way
Explanation:
Hill's (The Year of Miss Agnes ) finely detailed novel set in a Yup'ik Eskimo village in the 1890s feels mesmerizingly authentic.
Minuk, the narrator, is 12 the spring that the missionary family arrives, and like the other children she is fascinated by the sight of her first kass'aq (white) woman and child. She can't imagine what the "sort of pink butterfly" hanging from the clothesline is (a corset, which astonishes her still further), and when Mrs. Hoff invites her inside for a cup of tea, she sits on a chair for the first time (and tips hers over) and slurps loudly, "to be polite." These initial misunderstandings may be comic, but the encounters between the Hoffs and the Yup'ik have grave consequences. Mr. and Mrs. Hoff condemn the villagers' rituals and practices. Yet, as seen through Minuk's eyes, the customs make sense, and Hill demonstrates that the Yup'ik belief systems are at least as coherent as Hoffs' version of Christianity ("If your god is love," Minuk asks Mr. Hoff, "why does he make people burn in hell?"). The author penetrates Yup'ik culture to such an extent that readers are likely to find the Hoffs more foreign than Minuk and her family. At the same time, the author doesn't glamorize the villagers, in particular exposing the severe conditions facing women. Not only the heroine but the vanished society here feel alive in their complexities. Ages 9-12. (Oct.)
Answer:
Alcott's stories about the March family are timeless.
Explanation:
The author shows how the March family histories are timeless and for this reason, they are still relevant today and manage to move the imagination and admiration of modern readers. He says that this success is created mainly because Alcott had the ability to write about domestic life in a very exciting and stimulating way, although she found this kind of life dull.
