Facts and statistics relating to the topic
Not sure about but maybe
Answer:
The statement that best summarizes the difference between these two ads is They have different appeals.
Explanation:
The ad from 1971 that was widely known as "The Crying Indian" was part of a campaign that has the purpose of making people aware of pollution and that they can do something to fix it, the appeal was emotional, while the campaign that they launched in 2013 add something more to it, they added a proposal so now besides being emotional it also has a sense of logic in it.
Answer:
The answer is
Explanation:
The correct answer is this one: "describe the unique situation in Delaware courts."
Hope this helps....
Have a nice day!!!!
The Scottsboro Boys fought their case through the aid of a communist party who ensured their sentence was delayed and some of them got acquitted but not immediately. The Scottsboro’s boys 14th amendment were obliterated, and this caught the media’s attention for numerous years over this matter and the necessity for racial justice.
The example of a commonplace example of prejudice in this context entails racial prejudice and it fosters discrimination. In my own opinion, the 14th amendment of the Scottsboro Boys was violated based on the prejudice that clouded the jurisdiction’s predetermined opinion. They were not listened to because the jurisdiction’s opinion was already made up against Scottsboro Boys since they were Black hence they were guilty.
